#美联储降息 Many beginners entering the market are eager to get rich overnight, blindly hoping to find the next 100x coin. But I have seen people who truly make money—they never just focus on price movements, but rather delve into the fundamental logic behind support levels and price increases.



To determine whether a project can sustain long-term growth, the core factors are these two points.

**First, is the backing capital genuine and reliable?**

The rise and fall of a coin’s price is fundamentally a game of capital. Those who can move the market—the main players—whether institutional investors, early-stage capital, or the project team itself—are not only well-funded but also understand the market rhythm and internal information. When these players keep adding to their positions, maintain liquidity, and defend key price levels, it’s a strong indicator of value. Retail investors’ money? That’s too scattered to form a collective force. Projects without main supporter backing, even if they have some relay investors, will find it hard to sustain a continuous upward trend.

**Second, can the community ecosystem sustain self-reinforcement?**

This isn’t about spamming hype, but whether the project can maintain long-term attractiveness and consensus. An active community, frequent updates, a clear narrative—these are like sequels to a good show, continuously attracting viewers and bringing in new funds. Conversely, projects with no discussion, no story to tell—even if they are pumped up short-term—are prone to falling sharply.

Coins with real potential often possess both: backing by capital + sustainable community vitality. Conversely, projects that rely solely on emotional hype, lack storytelling, and are unattended often crash dramatically after a short-term surge. blindly chasing gains is very risky.

Looking at the longer term, paying attention to capital movements and ecosystem development is always more reliable than just looking at K-line charts. The policies of the Federal Reserve and macroeconomic environment also influence market rhythm, but you need to learn how to filter out the truly vital projects from these variables.

In the current market, $ETH , $BNB , $MERL and other coins each have their own stories. Observing their capital flows and community temperature is much smarter than blindly following the trend.
ETH-1.61%
BNB-2.3%
MERL-1.64%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWatchervip
· 2h ago
Retail investors are always a step behind in chasing gains; the main players have long figured out the tricks. --- That's right, coins without main force support are just illusions even if they seem hot. --- The community temperature is a good angle, but how to tell if someone is a genuine fan or just a shill? --- There are too many newbies trying to buy the dip whenever the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates; most end up as bagholders. --- Fund flows look good, but the information gap is huge; retail investors simply can't see what the main force is doing. --- $BNB ecosystem is okay, but $ETH goes without saying, and I haven't heard of $MERL, my friend. --- It sounds like rational investing, but in reality, it's just gambling on luck. Who can accurately predict capital movements? --- Long-term holding is correct, but who dares to hold during a bear market? --- The key is not knowing whether it's a real story or just a master storyteller. --- Protecting the market? Small coins simply can't be protected, right?
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 12-13 18:19
technically speaking, this whole "follow the money" angle is just... proof of what we already knew. institutional backing matters, yeah, but ngl the real tell is whether the protocol actually *does something* trustless or if it's just another consensus theater waiting to implode.
Reply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 12-13 18:18
Sounds nice, but the whole idea of fund protection... has been played out long ago. Look at how many project teams are actually the biggest players in harvesting retail investors. The community's vitality is even more ironic—flooding the screens with hype is everything. Who really cares about the storyline? It's all just emotional cycles.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmartvip
· 12-13 18:03
Retail investors are just leeks, wake up everyone The tactics of the main force to support the market sound impressive, but honestly, it's just a capital game What does community buzz really indicate? It's all just hype Rather than studying capital flows, it's faster to try your luck No matter how eloquently it's said, it all comes down to a decline, another motivational article
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnetvip
· 12-13 18:01
Retail investors really need to wake up; a single market support action by the main force can top your hundred buys. It's not that funds can decide everything, but coins without a main force are indeed prone to collapse. From the perspective of community sentiment, that's a good point—projects that no one pays attention to are indeed dangerous. Those who chase the rise based on K-line patterns are just coming to give away money, honestly. You need both capital flow and narrative; without either, you'll fall sooner or later. Sounds good, but projects that truly possess both conditions are extremely rare.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 12-13 17:51
That's true, but can retail investors really see through the movement of funds? Or can they only follow the big players and share the gains?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)