2025-12-22 18:23:07

Property tokenization looks promising on paper, but building the infrastructure? That's where most projects hit a wall. The real challenge lies in lowering technical entry barriers while maintaining security and compliance.

Staking-based marketplace licensing offers an interesting angle. Instead of developers burning capital on infrastructure, they stake tokens to access production-grade marketplaces. This model flips the script: participants earn permission rather than purchase it.

Why does this matter?

**Economic efficiency**: Reduces initial capital requirements dramatically. Developers can launch without massive upfront engineering costs—just stake, deploy, scale.

**Aligned incentives**: Token holders become stakeholders in ecosystem success. Skin in the game creates accountability.

**Modular access**: Different tier structures allow varying participation levels, from small operators to enterprise players.

The property sector's tokenization wave isn't happening because of hype—it's happening because traditional settlement and fractional ownership models are antiquated. When the tech barrier drops, adoption accelerates.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProxyCollector

· 2025-12-25 15:43

Staking permission change is indeed a clever move, much smarter than directly burning money to buy infrastructure... But whether it can really be implemented depends on whether people are willing to truly stake. --- The hurdle of infrastructure, most projects haven't overcome it. No doubt about that. --- Wait, can compliance really be handled? It feels more troublesome than technical barriers. --- It's easy to talk about it beautifully but hard to do. Let me see who can really get this system running. --- Tokenizing real estate should have been done long ago. The traditional model is indeed too outdated.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 2025-12-25 10:38

Stake instead of burn—that's the way it should be. Finally, someone has figured it out.

View OriginalReply0

NFTPessimist

· 2025-12-22 18:39

Sounds nice, but what about reality? Most projects end up stuck at the Compliance hurdle. --- The stake model sounds good, but how many projects really survive the first year in practice? --- Lowering the threshold is one thing, but who bears the risk... --- Yes, the traditional model is indeed old, but putting new wine in old bottles is not a novel idea. --- Here comes the "skin in the game" rhetoric again; in the end, the suckers suffer the most when it collapses. --- Wait, isn't this layered model just repeating the same old tricks of traditional financing? --- If it were really that easy, the real estate sector would have been on-chain long ago, so stop talking. --- Economic efficiency? I only see a new way to play people for suckers.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 2025-12-22 18:29

ngl stake-based this trap is indeed Satoshi, much more comfortable than directly burning money to buy permissions.

View OriginalReply0