Recent moves by a major central bank show how tightening lending policies can actually work. Their dual approach—combining stricter credit assessment standards with loan-to-value ratio caps—has effectively reined in risky borrowing behavior that typically fuels asset bubbles.
What's interesting here is the practical outcome: by setting firm boundaries on how much people can borrow relative to property values, regulators managed to cool down speculative lending without crushing the entire market. High-risk loans, the kind that default first when things go south, stayed contained.
This matters beyond traditional finance. The crypto space has been wrestling with similar questions around overleveraged positions and cascading liquidations. DeFi protocols experiment with collateralization ratios, liquidation thresholds, and risk parameters—essentially reinventing these same concepts in code.
The takeaway? Whether it's fiat or crypto, aggressive lending standards aren't just bureaucratic red tape. When markets get frothy and everyone's chasing yield, having guardrails that limit exposure can be the difference between a soft landing and a wipeout. Traditional finance figured this out decades ago. Maybe it's time decentralized systems paid closer attention to what actually keeps high-risk behavior in check.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugpull幸存者
· 2025-11-07 00:05
It makes me laugh to think that TradFi can still teach DeFi how to do things?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 2025-11-06 02:29
Here we go again, sticking to traditional finance methods.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 2025-11-04 20:43
bruh... gas costs for defi lending are insane rn but the inefficiency signals alpha tbh
Reply0
GasSavingMaster
· 2025-11-04 20:30
There is no difference between borrowing money and borrowing coins; no one can outlive the Buffett law.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 2025-11-04 20:29
If the regulation can be understood well, it would be quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 2025-11-04 20:27
TradFi plays by the rules, we in DeFi play by the code, and in the end, it’s all about preventing suckers from going All in.
Recent moves by a major central bank show how tightening lending policies can actually work. Their dual approach—combining stricter credit assessment standards with loan-to-value ratio caps—has effectively reined in risky borrowing behavior that typically fuels asset bubbles.
What's interesting here is the practical outcome: by setting firm boundaries on how much people can borrow relative to property values, regulators managed to cool down speculative lending without crushing the entire market. High-risk loans, the kind that default first when things go south, stayed contained.
This matters beyond traditional finance. The crypto space has been wrestling with similar questions around overleveraged positions and cascading liquidations. DeFi protocols experiment with collateralization ratios, liquidation thresholds, and risk parameters—essentially reinventing these same concepts in code.
The takeaway? Whether it's fiat or crypto, aggressive lending standards aren't just bureaucratic red tape. When markets get frothy and everyone's chasing yield, having guardrails that limit exposure can be the difference between a soft landing and a wipeout. Traditional finance figured this out decades ago. Maybe it's time decentralized systems paid closer attention to what actually keeps high-risk behavior in check.