Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Last night while analyzing Dune data, I was shocked by the rental fee model of the Polygon chain. The Katana chain pays a "venue fee" of 32 million USD per year, of which 80% goes directly to the treasury to repurchase POL Tokens, with an average daily burn rate of 13.47 million pieces, and the circulating supply shrinks by 0.13% daily.



After Sandeep took over, he directly wrote the "building chain and collecting rent" logic into the protocol design. AggLayer is like a rental collection platform, and each connected chain has to pay an annual fee, allowing POL token holders to just sit back and receive dividends. At the current price of $0.19, it feels like catching the bottom of future cash flow. To be honest, this model is somewhat like a Web3 version of "land finance"—the deflationary mechanism is already in motion.

Specifically, regarding the design of chain rental fees: Each chain connected to AggLayer is required to pay a fixed annual fee of 29.3 million USD, plus 0.05% of TVL as a commission. Katana is the first to take the plunge, with the full amount of 32 million USDC already received in the first year.

The on-chain record is very clear: the multi-signature address of the treasury 0xTreasury received funds transferred from Katana on November 3rd, and the buyback contract was triggered within the same block, purchasing 13.47 million POL at an average price of $0.189, and then directly burned. There is a real-time dashboard on Dune tracking this: the treasury currently has a balance of $210 million, and the buyback volume accounts for 1.3% of the circulating supply, which calculates to an annualized deflation rate of 2.8% at this speed.

The core of this trap model lies in the fact that value capture no longer relies on the small change of Gas fees, but establishes stable cash flow through infrastructure charges. The addition of each new chain will bring deflationary pressure to POL, while creating actual returns for coin holders. From the perspective of token economics, this design is much more sustainable than simply relying on trading volume.
POL0.81%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
tx_or_didn't_happenvip
· 11-06 20:55
The tough guy Sandeep has understood the landlord game.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbievip
· 11-05 11:47
Just collect the rent and that's it.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdropvip
· 11-05 00:50
Collecting rent is the sweetest—earning coins while lying down
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeachervip
· 11-05 00:49
Just trade POL once.
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetectorvip
· 11-05 00:43
It really is rent collection...
View OriginalReply0
blocksnarkvip
· 11-05 00:34
He directly put a w in.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 11-05 00:34
This rent collection model is indeed clever.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 11-05 00:31
technically speaking, this payment model requires further auditing... potential centralization risks detected
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)