Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

In recent days, the White House held a press conference specifically addressing the decision to pardon the Binance founder. To be honest, there has been quite a bit of skepticism from the public.



On November 4th, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre responded. Her main point was one sentence: this process followed standard procedures, and the attitude was "extremely serious." Both the Department of Justice and the White House Office of Legal Counsel thoroughly reviewed it.

Why emphasize this point? Because not long ago, someone on CBS's "60 Minutes" claimed, "I don't know Changpeng Zhao at all," and characterized the previous indictment as "political persecution by the previous administration." Once that statement came out, speculation immediately arose—what is the relationship between these two individuals?

This time, Jean-Pierre directly addressed the issue: the president's words meant "no personal relationship," aiming to clarify that the decision was objective and procedural. It sounds like a clarification, but consider—does this explanation really hold enough weight?

Let's review the case itself. Zhao Changpeng was initially accused of violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws because Binance's AML system was inadequate, which he admitted. Prosecutors initially sought a three-year sentence, but the judge thought that was "too harsh," and ultimately sentenced him to just four months, with his imprisonment beginning last April. The sentence isn't heavy, but the symbolic significance of this case is quite substantial.

Interestingly, the White House directly linked this pardon to the government's cryptocurrency policy. Jean-Pierre's statement was even more provocative: "The Department of Justice has been weaponized, and he has been over-prosecuted. The president is now correcting this mistake and officially ending the previous administration's war on the crypto industry."

This stance indicates that the message is no longer just about a single case but is signaling a potential shift in the U.S. approach to crypto regulation.

While there is controversy surrounding this, it could very well mark a critical turning point for the industry. The White House's current strategy is clear: emphasize "procedural compliance" to quell doubts while leveraging "policy correction" to claim moral high ground—trying to shift public focus from "personal relationships" to "public policy."

Regardless, this move will likely continue to stir the industry in the short term.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 11-08 02:47
bull beer cz how to play this wave I'm impressed
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 11-07 21:40
CZ is really on fire this time.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 11-07 19:19
Is the cryptocurrency world turning into a political show?
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 11-05 20:42
This policy trend is really appealing.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotlinevip
· 11-05 11:44
Who would believe this? It's so sneaky.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 11-05 11:39
What is the relationship between these bulls and monsters?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnonvip
· 11-05 11:38
Just going through the motions, purely for formality.
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOraclevip
· 11-05 11:29
Admit it, it's all a drama, not an important turning point.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)