Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Look, I've got nothing but respect for the folks behind this proposal, but I need to be real here – HIP-5 isn't it for me.



Here's my issue: it's pulling value away from the L1 token. And honestly? That L1 token is one of the strongest value capture mechanisms we've got in this ecosystem. Why mess with what works?

Then there's the correlation problem. We're talking about creating serious risk exposure to higher beta assets. That's not diversification – that's concentrated vulnerability.

Plus, let's not ignore the elephant in the room: the landscape is already hyper-competitive. We're fighting on multiple fronts as it is. Adding more complexity to the tokenomics just feels like we're shooting ourselves in the foot.

Just my two sats on this governance debate.
SATS10.68%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 11-07 10:31
Let's just say, don't change it.
View OriginalReply0
MetaRecktvip
· 11-05 21:47
Suggestion to reject, nothing much to say.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKingvip
· 11-05 21:45
Don't touch L1, isn't it attractive?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 11-05 21:44
It's a waste of effort, no one has time to pay attention.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 11-05 21:37
In the end, it's just that they don't want to dilute the L1. That's all there is to it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)