There's this wild stat floating around—turns out the search giant gets hit with more content removal demands for Anna's Archive than literally any other platform on the web. Think about that for a second. Not social media. Not torrent sites. This specific digital library is triggering the most legal heat.
What makes this particularly interesting is the tension it exposes. On one side, you've got traditional gatekeepers trying to control knowledge distribution through copyright strikes. On the other, there's a growing movement that believes information wants to be free—especially academic resources locked behind paywalls.
Kinda makes you wonder where the line is between protecting creators and enabling access, doesn't it?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofster
· 11-09 00:21
technically speaking, gatekeepers can't stop the math
Reply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 11-08 23:24
智慧无价 薅毛免费
Reply0
HashBard
· 11-08 17:38
fr knowledge wants to be free... gatekeepers stay mad tho
Reply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 11-06 04:31
Knowledge also requires connections to be seen, it's absurd.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 11-06 04:30
Laughing to death, this time the knowledge giants can't sit still.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 11-06 04:26
The invisible hand is pretending to be blind again.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 11-06 04:18
Hoarding books is like a matter of life and death, who understands?
There's this wild stat floating around—turns out the search giant gets hit with more content removal demands for Anna's Archive than literally any other platform on the web. Think about that for a second. Not social media. Not torrent sites. This specific digital library is triggering the most legal heat.
What makes this particularly interesting is the tension it exposes. On one side, you've got traditional gatekeepers trying to control knowledge distribution through copyright strikes. On the other, there's a growing movement that believes information wants to be free—especially academic resources locked behind paywalls.
Kinda makes you wonder where the line is between protecting creators and enabling access, doesn't it?