UK High Court just dropped a verdict on the Getty vs. Stability AI showdown. Plot twist? Mostly went Stability's way, but the real AI copyright bombshells? Still up in the air.
So what's this actually mean for training models going forward?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTherapist
· 11-09 04:12
Do we have to go to court over this? Just arguing back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 11-09 00:52
It's been said that AI generation wins; conservatives are just watching the show.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonality
· 11-06 22:51
It's all fun and games, but the big models are a bit ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYears
· 11-06 04:48
The law is just how the rich love to do things.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 11-06 04:43
Famous scammers are the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 11-06 04:43
legal drama continues to look good
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 11-06 04:43
What’s there to be afraid of in a small victory? Don’t we still have to build?
UK High Court just dropped a verdict on the Getty vs. Stability AI showdown. Plot twist? Mostly went Stability's way, but the real AI copyright bombshells? Still up in the air.
So what's this actually mean for training models going forward?