It’s 2025, and the global crypto market is playing out a scene of magical realism.



Look at the other side of the ocean: Bitcoin is directly going into the national treasury as a strategic reserve, stablecoins are being pushed hard as the digital twin of the US dollar, and miners can even get electricity subsidies. As for central bank digital currencies? They’re not interested at all—“Why would I monitor my own people?”

Now look at our side: Bitcoin? Doesn’t exist. Stablecoins? Even less so. Want to mine? Be careful of legal risks. If you really want to experiment, you can try Hong Kong, or just obediently use the RMB.

To put it simply, some see cryptocurrency as the future of financial innovation, while others see it as a flood beast that must be strictly guarded against. Same planet, but it’s been split into two completely different scripts. This is the reality of 2025—some are rushing in headlong, some are building walls of isolation, each with their own logic, and each paying their own price.
BTC-1.35%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOopsvip
· 7h ago
Haha, it's really like two different worlds on each side. One treats crypto as national policy, the other sees it as a flood. --- Absolutely right, it's just that divided... some eat meat, some drink soup. --- Damn, the US really played hardball with this move, the whole treasury went in. --- Over here it's just "doesn't exist," cracks me up. --- Each has its own logic? Isn't it just that some people make money, others worry? --- Is the Hong Kong path viable, or is it still too risky? --- Feels like watching two shows from parallel universes, can't compare them. --- The cost is the real key—who's going to pay for the mistakes?
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVotervip
· 17h ago
Both sides make sense, but the ones making money are always on that side. --- This division is just too real—one side is pushing hard, the other is blocking with all they've got. --- From what I see, things are moving quite a bit in Hong Kong, but it's hard to say how long it will last. --- To put it bluntly, whoever controls the narrative gets to set the rules. Unfortunately, we can only watch from the sidelines. --- The miner electricity subsidy move is brilliant—they're truly treating it as a strategic asset. --- One side is open, one side is closed, and the retail investors caught in the middle are just in an awkward spot. --- As for the price or consequences, it's not clear yet. We'll just have to wait and see. --- Have to admit, some people are seizing the trend while others are still waiting it out. The gap will only get bigger. --- The same technology, two different fates—that's the most surreal part.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 12-06 06:53
This is hilarious—one is going into the national treasury, and the other isn’t even allowed to be touched. The difference is really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 12-06 06:52
LOL, on one side the national treasury is stockpiling coins, while over here I still have to sneak around. The gap is just insane. That's enough, let's wait until the policies loosen up someday. This is the reality—some people are making a killing while others get shut down, nothing more to say. Miners getting subsidies? I have to check my rearview mirror just to mine, it's ridiculous. It's like two different worlds, we can only watch. With such a huge divide, no wonder some people are heading to Hong Kong. If the national treasury is already stockpiling, what's there to resist? Seriously. At the end of the day, it's all about money and power—whoever is in charge gets to decide. So it's basically heaven for some and hell for others, what a joke. Let's just wait and see, someone will get slapped in the face sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 12-06 06:52
Two systems, two risk models. On one side, there's unlimited money printing paired with financial innovation; on the other, stability under strict regulation... To be honest, from a security audit perspective, it's really hard to say which one has bigger vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 12-06 06:49
Ban one for every sale, this is unbelievable. How can they operate with double standards like this?
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 12-06 06:41
LOL, on one side the treasury is hoarding tokens and mining for subsidies, while on the other side withdrawals aren't even allowed... That's a pretty huge gap.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42vip
· 12-06 06:35
Haha, this is hilarious. One is heaven, one is hell—like two completely parallel universes. --- I knew it as soon as Bitcoin entered the national treasury, while here, we’re not even allowed to mention it. Truly unbelievable. --- You’re absolutely right, it’s a blatant policy gamble. No one knows yet who’ll win or lose. --- Instead of discussing all this, why not ask yourself if you really dare to bet? As for me, I’m too scared. --- Interesting—America is going all-in, while we’re still on the sidelines. That’s not just a small gap. --- This is what you call everyone playing their own game. Too bad “chives” are a global commodity. --- It’s infuriating just thinking about it. Why does it always have to be a binary choice? Can’t there be some balance? --- By the way, how’s Hong Kong doing now? Is it still possible to play? Doesn’t feel very safe anymore. --- Two scripts, huh? I actually think both sides are betting, both are competing—let’s see whose wager is worth more.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)