The OM Case: From “Price Crash” to an Organized Manipulation File

How OKX’s Statement Exposed What the MANTRA Team Tried to Conceal

In the crypto world, many projects collapse.
But only a few get exposed.
The OM (MANTRA) case is no longer about “market volatility” or a “sudden sell-off.”
It has officially evolved into an organized market manipulation case following the latest statement released by OKX.

This article does not add accusations.
It simply reorganizes the publicly stated facts and places them clearly in front of the community.
🔴 First: What Did OKX Explicitly State?

OKX’s statement was not a generic defense.
It was a technical and legal disclosure outlining the following:
The existence of multiple connected and colluding accounts

Using large quantities of OM

As collateral to borrow USDT
With the intent of artificially inflating OM’s price

In any regulated market, this behavior is defined as:

Market Manipulation

Such language is not used publicly without documented and verifiable evidence.

🧩 The Critical Question the MANTRA Team Has Not Answered

OKX raised a fundamental and unavoidable question:

Where did these unusually large quantities of OM originate from?
And why were they concentrated under the control of a small, connected group?

To date:

No official explanation from MANTRA

No transparent disclosure of real token distribution

No clarification on how such supply concentration occurred
Silence here is not neutrality — it is implication.

⚖️ Was OKX Responsible for the Price Collapse?

OKX’s statement was unambiguous:

Only a very small portion of OM was liquidated

Losses were not passed on to users

They were fully absorbed by the OKX Security Fund

Independent third-party analyses confirmed that the primary trading activity driving the crash did not occur on OKX

In simple terms:

OKX did not crash the price — it contained a crisis created elsewhere.

🚨 Why This Statement Validates the Community Campaign

Before this disclosure, the MANTRA team consistently promoted one narrative:

“Exchanges caused the crash.”

Now, an official statement confirms:

The issue was collusion

Supply concentration

And coordinated manipulation

This is exactly what the community had been warning about from the start.

Not an attack — but an early warning.

🧠 The Most Serious Development: Regulatory Involvement

OKX explicitly confirmed:

Full evidence has been submitted to regulators and law enforcement

Multiple legal proceedings and litigations are currently underway

This means:

The issue has moved beyond social media debates

It is now an active legal and regulatory matter

Any continued misinformation may carry legal consequences

🔥 Conclusion: This Was Not a Market Crash — It Was a Structural Exposure

What happened to OM is not an isolated incident.
It represents a recurring pattern when:

Token distribution lacks transparency

Assets are used as manipulation tools

And responsibility is shifted to “the market”

This time, however:

Data spoke louder than narratives.
The real question is no longer:

Who crashed the price?

But rather:

Who controlled that supply — and why?

⚠️ A Final Message to the Community

Do not accept recycled narratives

Do not be distracted by rebranding or token mergers

Accountability does not disappear with new packaging

Transparency is not optional. It is an obligation.

#OM #MANTRA #OKX #CryptoJustice
#MarketManipulation #WhaleBreaker
#FundsDontVanishTheyMove
#JusticeForOM