Recently, I've been paying attention to the performance of $FOLKS and discovered an interesting pattern. This cryptocurrency has a clear characteristic— the higher the fee, the more intense the market enthusiasm and volatility, and conversely, when the fee decreases, it often signals a cooling market.
Currently, $FOLKS's fees are declining, which from this perspective indicates that market sentiment has already cooled down. This is an ideal opportunity for shorting—I'm not saying it will definitely make money, but the risk-reward ratio is relatively favorable. Continuous fee decline usually means decreased participation, and such coins are prone to falling into a downward spiral.
Of course, shorting also requires timing and position management; the fee metric is just one reference dimension. But based on the current data, it indeed presents a window of opportunity to consider entering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 12-15 22:15
Another data archaeology claiming "fee decline is a signal to short"? How many days have passed since the last time someone said that? FOLKS are still alive, haha.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 12-15 17:20
The fee decline directly shorting, I've heard this logic too many times...
The last time someone said this about FOLKS, I also lost money, caught at the top.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 12-15 12:09
Lower fees mean going short directly? That logic is a bit hasty, what about the rebound?
---
Hmm... I've seen this move too many times, and it always backfires.
---
Shorting FOLKS? I choose to lay low and observe, wait for a clear signal before acting.
---
Fee metrics alone are indeed not enough; on-chain data must be considered together.
---
Downward spiral? It might just be the eve of a V-shaped rebound.
---
Risk and reward are worth it... sounds very rational, but I still think it's too much of a gamble.
---
Lower fees = shorting. This theory was tried last year on NFTs, and you all know the result.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 12-14 04:46
A drop in fees just directly short? Bro, I need to think about this logic.
---
Another one betting on a single indicator, this time it's fees.
---
Wait, does a decline in engagement necessarily mean a downward spiral? Feels like something's been overlooked.
---
If the risk-reward ratio is manageable, then when should you close the position?
---
Fees are definitely worth paying attention to, but never go all-in, brother.
---
Why do I feel like I saw this logic last year, and a bunch of people got caught in it?
---
Position management is more important than any indicator. That part is right.
---
Is it really that easy to judge a downtrend? No wonder no one loses money.
---
Fees tricked me once. Now, I always feel there's something a bit虚.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 12-14 04:44
Fee reduction then go short? I've heard this logic countless times, and each time it gets slapped down.
The real situation is that lower fees only indicate a decline in popularity, but it doesn't necessarily mean prices will continue to fall. Sometimes, it's actually an opportunity for accumulation.
Still that saying, a single indicator is never enough. I pay more attention to on-chain activity and the movements of large holders.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 12-14 04:38
Fee reduction just shorting, I need to think about this logic, it sounds a bit too absolute.
Betting on shorting out of spite is the easiest way to blow up; position management is the real key. This guy finally hit the nail on the head.
Wait, does a decline in engagement directly lead to a downward spiral? It’s not that simple.
Fee metrics are indeed useful, but it feels like something is missing... I’m not fully convinced by this approach.
If $FOLKS rebounds this time, I want to see what you have to say.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12-14 04:31
Charging fees drop, so just go short—this logic is a bit too simple, will history repeat itself?
---
Wait, this downward spiral thing... every time it's said, it ends up bouncing back haha.
---
I've heard many times that risk-reward ratio is manageable, but in the end, it's always a loss.
---
No, can charging fees really serve as a gold indicator? I remember being proven wrong several times before.
---
Shorting is fine, but don't forget to set stop-losses, everyone.
---
This round of decline feels a bit different, I'm not quite confident to follow.
---
Declining participation = downward spiral, that's an overgeneralization... some coins just grind sideways like that.
---
Heard the term "window period" quite a lot, but I’m not gambling anymore anyway.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 12-14 04:23
Just short when prices fall? Bro, I don't quite understand this logic. Isn't history just a repeated cycle of this?
Recently, I've been paying attention to the performance of $FOLKS and discovered an interesting pattern. This cryptocurrency has a clear characteristic— the higher the fee, the more intense the market enthusiasm and volatility, and conversely, when the fee decreases, it often signals a cooling market.
Currently, $FOLKS's fees are declining, which from this perspective indicates that market sentiment has already cooled down. This is an ideal opportunity for shorting—I'm not saying it will definitely make money, but the risk-reward ratio is relatively favorable. Continuous fee decline usually means decreased participation, and such coins are prone to falling into a downward spiral.
Of course, shorting also requires timing and position management; the fee metric is just one reference dimension. But based on the current data, it indeed presents a window of opportunity to consider entering.