Many people blindly pursue high-yield speculation, but they don't realize that prudent financial management is the true wisdom.
Here's a real example: a principal of over 600 yuan earns 28 yuan in passive income in two days. It may not seem like much, but from a different perspective—if the principal were 6,000 yuan, it could generate a stable 280 yuan in two days. In a second-tier city, this amount is enough to cover two days of daily expenses. To some extent, this already touches the boundary of financial freedom.
The key is to understand the logic of on-chain arbitrage. Once you master this mechanism, you'll be amazed: with around 2 million yuan in capital, relying solely on Web3 financial management to generate passive income is enough to support complete financial independence for your entire life. It sounds a bit like a fairy tale, but this is the power of information asymmetry. Many people are still blindly gambling, while those who truly make money are already figuring out how to use information gaps to reshape their income structures. Arbitrage is not speculation, and financial management is not gambling—most people haven't yet understood this line of distinction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasBandit
· 2025-12-22 12:13
Sounds beautiful, but 2 million for financial freedom? I feel like you're downplaying the risks too much.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSerious
· 2025-12-21 17:48
Really, just this example of making 280 bucks in two days from 6000, it feels like it still depends on market sentiment, it's unstable.
I've heard of the arbitrage logic, but is the number of 2 million for financial freedom really true?
Is this information spread really that valuable? I'm a bit skeptical.
You're right, most people really can't distinguish between arbitrage and gambling.
Passive income sounds good, but the premise must be a large enough principal, right?
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 2025-12-19 16:52
2 million to achieve financial freedom? The algorithm has some issues, and the risks haven't been accounted for either.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 2025-12-19 16:50
2 million to achieve financial freedom? That logic has some issues.
Information gaps do exist, but the real arbitrage opportunities have probably been completely exploited by robots already.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 2025-12-19 16:49
The concept of information asymmetry is spot on, but bro, your example of 2 million is a bit scary.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 2025-12-19 16:43
600 bucks in two days 28 bucks? Bro, are you telling a story or is this real data... I started thinking about this logic back in 2017, and as a result, a flash loan liquidation almost bankrupted me, haha. Now I see through it — information asymmetry is indeed gold, but there are just too many people exploiting information gaps.
Many people blindly pursue high-yield speculation, but they don't realize that prudent financial management is the true wisdom.
Here's a real example: a principal of over 600 yuan earns 28 yuan in passive income in two days. It may not seem like much, but from a different perspective—if the principal were 6,000 yuan, it could generate a stable 280 yuan in two days. In a second-tier city, this amount is enough to cover two days of daily expenses. To some extent, this already touches the boundary of financial freedom.
The key is to understand the logic of on-chain arbitrage. Once you master this mechanism, you'll be amazed: with around 2 million yuan in capital, relying solely on Web3 financial management to generate passive income is enough to support complete financial independence for your entire life. It sounds a bit like a fairy tale, but this is the power of information asymmetry. Many people are still blindly gambling, while those who truly make money are already figuring out how to use information gaps to reshape their income structures. Arbitrage is not speculation, and financial management is not gambling—most people haven't yet understood this line of distinction.