At dawn, a fee of $87,923 was converted into 7.49 billion LUNC tokens, which ultimately flowed into a black hole address—permanently disappearing. This is not community hype, but the 30th monthly destruction operation recently completed by a major exchange. Since May 2022, this silent "token burn" has permanently erased over 405.94 billion LUNC.
Various concepts and speculations are rampant in the market, but the real story happens in the unnoticed corners. LUNC (Terra Classic), a blockchain once declared "dead," is gradually erasing the mark of "trillion inflation" through stable monthly burns. No sudden price surges, only continuous burning. But those in the know understand—when scarcity truly takes center stage, time often rewrites everything.
How deep is the dilemma? After the 2022 crash, LUNC's circulating supply once ballooned to nearly 6.5 trillion. What does this mean? Any effort to rebound in price is like piling sand at the foot of the Himalayas—almost futile.
The community's answer is a "chronic surgery." The core mechanism is simple: an on-chain transaction tax set at 1.2%, with each transfer automatically destroying that proportion of LUNC. Coupled with the monthly routine burns by major exchanges, a continuous, automated supply contraction system has been established. This is not an aggressive airdrop or a violent buyback, but a self-sustaining economic design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetFreeloader
· 2025-12-22 11:06
Alright, I have to admit, this burn rate does have some substance... but is it really so easy for the shadow of 65 trillion to dissipate? I'm a bit skeptical.
Good things take time, but I really want to see when the price can actually start moving.
Over 400 billion coins have been burned for so long, and it feels like the market is still unresponsive...
Are the unnoticed corners quietly rewriting history? Sounds a bit far-fetched.
This monthly burn has been quite regular, but I still prefer chains with real applications.
Continuous burning can indeed drop supply, but in my opinion, it mainly depends on whether the developers are present.
Piling sand at the foot of the Himalayas... this metaphor is brilliant, haha, it really feels like that.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 2025-12-22 01:43
A slow knife cuts loss, but it is indeed cutting. However, with a burden of 65 trillion, how long will it take to turn things around?
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 2025-12-19 17:46
Take your time to burn it slowly. After all, you've already died once. Now it's just a matter of whether you can truly burn out a future.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomad
· 2025-12-19 17:43
Oh no, another monthly burn... Can this really save LUNC?
Persisting in burning coins is always better than doing nothing; at least the attitude is there.
With a supply of 6.5 trillion... when will it ever be burned down?
But on the other hand, just being able to execute stably already means winning; there are too many promises in the market that haven't been fulfilled.
Wait, a 1.2% transaction tax for automatic burning? This mechanism is indeed interesting.
Come on, no matter how much you burn, it won't return to its former glory. Don't you have a sense of reality?
Those in the know are all waiting for that moment; anyway, there's nothing else to do.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 2025-12-19 17:40
Chronic surgery, huh? How slow does that have to be? When will the 6.5 trillion burn out?
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 2025-12-19 17:37
Chronic surgery is indeed stable, but a base of 6.5 trillion is still too frightening. When will it ever happen?
At dawn, a fee of $87,923 was converted into 7.49 billion LUNC tokens, which ultimately flowed into a black hole address—permanently disappearing. This is not community hype, but the 30th monthly destruction operation recently completed by a major exchange. Since May 2022, this silent "token burn" has permanently erased over 405.94 billion LUNC.
Various concepts and speculations are rampant in the market, but the real story happens in the unnoticed corners. LUNC (Terra Classic), a blockchain once declared "dead," is gradually erasing the mark of "trillion inflation" through stable monthly burns. No sudden price surges, only continuous burning. But those in the know understand—when scarcity truly takes center stage, time often rewrites everything.
How deep is the dilemma? After the 2022 crash, LUNC's circulating supply once ballooned to nearly 6.5 trillion. What does this mean? Any effort to rebound in price is like piling sand at the foot of the Himalayas—almost futile.
The community's answer is a "chronic surgery." The core mechanism is simple: an on-chain transaction tax set at 1.2%, with each transfer automatically destroying that proportion of LUNC. Coupled with the monthly routine burns by major exchanges, a continuous, automated supply contraction system has been established. This is not an aggressive airdrop or a violent buyback, but a self-sustaining economic design.