Recently, the news about cracking down on illegal information starting from the New Year has been widely circulated, but the actual likelihood of it being implemented as regular enforcement is not that high.
Such policy news is often exaggerated by the media, and as netizens pass it around, it turns into a joke. If you really want to get to the bottom of it, you need to consider these points:
Is there really a "spread" out? Is the "situation" severe enough? Is there an "intent to profit or disseminate"? Has it caused any actual social impact?
From a law enforcement perspective, resource allocation also has its focus - mainly on those types of mass actions, which are the primary targets for crackdown. Simple private chats are often not a priority for law enforcement.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureDenied
· 2025-12-23 17:50
It's this trap again, making a huge racket and in the end, nothing happens. I just want to see who really got caught.
Recently, the news about cracking down on illegal information starting from the New Year has been widely circulated, but the actual likelihood of it being implemented as regular enforcement is not that high.
Such policy news is often exaggerated by the media, and as netizens pass it around, it turns into a joke. If you really want to get to the bottom of it, you need to consider these points:
Is there really a "spread" out?
Is the "situation" severe enough?
Is there an "intent to profit or disseminate"?
Has it caused any actual social impact?
From a law enforcement perspective, resource allocation also has its focus - mainly on those types of mass actions, which are the primary targets for crackdown. Simple private chats are often not a priority for law enforcement.