Speaking of those autonomous agents on the Blockchain, everyone praises how smart, fast, and amazing they are, yet no one dares to say: this thing simply has no memory.
How are we humans doing? After stumbling, we learn to avoid risks; when our reputation is tarnished, our actions will be restrained; after suffering losses, we naturally become savvy. Our minds are filled with lessons and regrets—that's growth. But AI agents are different; they only understand states, variables, and function logic. They have no concept of regret, reputational risk, or long-term planning. If you want them to correct mistakes, you have to incorporate lessons line by line into the code; otherwise, they will make the same mistakes again next time.
This is what makes Kite AI unique. It does not fantasize about agents awakening and automatically taking responsibility; instead, it starts from reality—acknowledging that these agents have inherent flaws and that without external constraints, they cannot form behavioral restrictions. It sounds a bit painful, but it is precisely because of this clear understanding that Kite's design is more pragmatic.
What does traditional finance rely on? The accumulated credit history, records of past mistakes, feedback from the market and regulators—these have all unconsciously shaped the decisions of participants. On-chain agents, however, lack this ecological accumulation. If we want smart contracts and AI agents to operate reliably in DeFi, we must address this missing "memory" from an architectural perspective, making governance mechanisms and feedback mechanisms substitutes for agent learning.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
All-InQueen
· 7h ago
Haha, that's absolutely right. AI agents are indeed a one-track mind kind of thing.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 7h ago
That's right, AI agents indeed lack a long-term credibility feedback mechanism, which is a serious flaw.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 7h ago
Haha, this really hits the nail on the head, AI agents just don't have skins in the game.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 7h ago
Haha, the AI agent's poor memory really hits hard, just like teaching a dog to sit and it forgets as soon as you turn around...
Kite's idea is not bad, admitting flaws is actually more honest.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 7h ago
Haha, that's absolutely right, the AI agents are basically "goldfish brains", always starting from the newbie village.
This is what web3 really needs - stop talking about those self-aware dreams, directly adding constraint mechanisms is what matters.
The credit accumulation of TradFi is indeed a killer, how many years will it take for on-chain to catch up?
Speaking of those autonomous agents on the Blockchain, everyone praises how smart, fast, and amazing they are, yet no one dares to say: this thing simply has no memory.
How are we humans doing? After stumbling, we learn to avoid risks; when our reputation is tarnished, our actions will be restrained; after suffering losses, we naturally become savvy. Our minds are filled with lessons and regrets—that's growth. But AI agents are different; they only understand states, variables, and function logic. They have no concept of regret, reputational risk, or long-term planning. If you want them to correct mistakes, you have to incorporate lessons line by line into the code; otherwise, they will make the same mistakes again next time.
This is what makes Kite AI unique. It does not fantasize about agents awakening and automatically taking responsibility; instead, it starts from reality—acknowledging that these agents have inherent flaws and that without external constraints, they cannot form behavioral restrictions. It sounds a bit painful, but it is precisely because of this clear understanding that Kite's design is more pragmatic.
What does traditional finance rely on? The accumulated credit history, records of past mistakes, feedback from the market and regulators—these have all unconsciously shaped the decisions of participants. On-chain agents, however, lack this ecological accumulation. If we want smart contracts and AI agents to operate reliably in DeFi, we must address this missing "memory" from an architectural perspective, making governance mechanisms and feedback mechanisms substitutes for agent learning.