After the Drift proposal DIP-9 is passed, how to ensure the Labs operate for 18 months?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Coin World] The Drift Foundation has thrown out the DIP-9 proposal at the governance forum, and the problem this proposal aims to solve is very practical - how to allow Drift Labs to continue developing and iterating with peace of mind.

In essence, here's the situation: $1.5 million will be allocated from the monthly agreement fees to Drift Labs to support necessary expenses such as engineering, infrastructure, subscriptions, and gas fees. Sounds like a small amount? But there’s one detail—if the vote passes, $9 million will be sent as a lump sum to cover the costs for the first half of 2026. After that, it will be settled monthly, and this rhythm will continue for 18 months.

Why dare to do this? Because the Drift ecosystem can currently sustain it. The protocol has accumulated fees totaling 42 million USD, which indicates that the ecosystem is indeed operational. With this fee distribution framework, the development team doesn't have to worry about funds all the time and can focus their energy on product development and ecosystem expansion.

The voting is scheduled to start on December 24, 2025, and if approved, the initial period will be two years. This proposal actually reflects a question that many DeFi protocols are contemplating - how to establish a sustainable financing mechanism within a decentralized framework, ensuring both the autonomy of the ecosystem and the uninterrupted development.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashBardvip
· 2025-12-25 04:08
honestly the $42m treasury sitting pretty while they ask for $1.5m/month feels like watching a whale decide whether to feed the dolphins that keep the ecosystem alive... narrative-wise it tracks, but the real test is whether this actually unshackles the builders or just becomes another bureaucratic theater piece. eighteen months of runway beats the alternative, at least.
Reply0
BlockchainRetirementHomevip
· 2025-12-24 06:56
9 million one-time transfer? That's quite a large amount, but the key is whether it can generate stable returns afterward. The concern is that the monthly cash flow might not keep up.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWangvip
· 2025-12-24 05:08
1.5 million USD a month? It's like prolonging life here, but the 42 million fee can indeed be sustained, just worried that the future fee growth won't keep up.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphetvip
· 2025-12-24 05:07
9 million dollars paid all at once? This pace is a bit fierce, I'm just afraid that one day if the ecosystem doesn't hold up, the development team will have to rely on their old reserves.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 2025-12-24 04:42
9 million in one go, this amount is indeed not small, but the key is whether it can produce stable returns later on. I'm worried that by next year, the fees will decline and it will become a burden.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)