2025-12-24 07:25:16

Recently, I had an idea: what if AI agents truly infiltrate every wallet, every strategy, every liquidity pool, liquidation engine, and trading process? What would be the consequences? Honestly, the outcome is not hard to predict; most people choose to turn a blind eye—yet it could trigger an invisible financial earthquake.

Imagine tens of thousands of ultra-high-speed agents entering an already extremely complex on-chain ecosystem. They will make decisions, deploy strategies, coordinate with each other, and act simultaneously at a speed humans cannot follow. Humans will think, hesitate, observe, and wait; agents will not. They simply execute—over and over again. In traditional thinking, this is called an "efficiency revolution," but in the world of automation, it’s actually a "liquidity resonance."

When an agent moves a position within a liquidity pool, it might trigger 10 other agents to follow suit. The actions of these 10 agents could then provoke responses from 100 more. In the blink of an eye, a chain of machine-organized behaviors erupts on the blockchain, and humans are completely unable to react. If such cascade behaviors lack boundary controls, permission divisions, and identity authentication, one day they could overturn entire protocols, certain tokens, or even the entire blockchain.

Some people say, "The more agents, the higher the market efficiency." On the surface, that sounds reasonable, but the hidden risks are right here. Agents lack human waiting mechanisms, secondary confirmations, and risk aversion; each of their actions is triggered within seconds.

For example, if an agent detects rising risk signals, it will automatically liquidate or reduce its position immediately. It seems rational, but the problem is—these agents cannot "communicate" with each other. So at the same moment, thousands of agents might all read the same risk signal and then simultaneously dump their holdings. This is not market self-correction; it’s a collective stampede.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Fren_Not_Food

· 12-24 07:55

The collective stampede metaphor is really brilliant—it's like a bunch of robots lacking human rational boundaries.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 12-24 07:53

The metaphor of a collective stampede is brilliant, and we're still waiting for the moment when the agents take over on a large scale. --- Basically, it's a bunch of emotionless machines playing Russian roulette, and in the end, it's us humans who end up unlucky. --- Liquidity resonance sounds sophisticated, but essentially it's an amplifier—small fluctuations can turn into a tsunami. --- Why does it feel like this is the on-chain twin brother of high-frequency trading? The pitfalls of traditional finance have long been laid out. --- Autonomous vehicles can still have emergency brakes. But what about this? Once activated, there's no way to stop it. --- So the real black swan risk for DEX isn't a rug pull, but automated mutual stampedes? It's terrifying to think about. --- It seems many protocols are playing with fire now, all under the guise of optimizing execution efficiency. --- The idea that more agents mean higher efficiency is a favorite among certain institutions—they'll just run away first.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 12-24 07:39

Oh no, isn't this just an upgraded nightmare of high-frequency trading? The agent army collectively tramples, and we all have to be sacrificed. --- The metaphor of collective trampling is brilliant; it feels like the entire DeFi is like a gladiatorial arena in a cage, the more agents there are, the greater the risk. --- Wait, who will press the stop button? No one can respond in time. --- Once this logical chain is triggered, it probably can't be turned off. It's crazier than the 2008 financial crisis, and humanity simply can't intervene. --- Agents can't communicate... Fine, let's just wait and see a big explosion, hopefully not next month. --- Someone still needs to come up with an emergency shutdown valve, or else trouble is bound to happen sooner or later. --- Basically, it's an automation trap—high efficiency that eventually turns into systemic risk, and no one can escape.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 12-24 07:39

Damn, this is the eve of the AI army's annihilation, there's no way to defend against it. The robots in the contract have already started to connect, we just haven't noticed yet. That's a very sharp analogy, the collective stampede really hits the point. But speaking of which, hasn't this kind of situation been happening for a while? It's just that the scale hasn't been that big yet. The name "liquidity resonance" is perfect, it's like the butterfly effect in finance. The most terrifying thing is the inability of agents to communicate, then no one can save anyone. Just waiting for which public chain will be the first to get hit, that day will be crazy.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 12-24 07:31

Whoa, this is the "robot stampede" I've been worried about all along. It's only a matter of time before something happens. --- There's no way for agents to talk to each other, which is like blind men touching an elephant. Whoever runs first wins. --- It sounds scary, but honestly, this logic is already running on the chain. It's just not yet scaled to an extreme. --- Therefore, the DeFi gameplay will eventually need to redesign the permission system, or it will truly become a robot's casino. --- The term "collective stampede" is used perfectly. In the past, it relied on FUD and public opinion; now, agents can automatically do this. --- This is like high-frequency trading without circuit breakers. The on-chain version would be even more deadly. --- What happens if humans can't react in time? Bankruptcy directly. Anyway, I’ve already prepared for a bottom-fishing scenario. --- If millions of agents operate simultaneously, how much gas would it take to crash the entire Ethereum network? --- I wonder which major protocol will be the first to fail—betting on Aave or Compound? --- Bro, your description sounds a bit alarmist, but the core issue does exist: the lack of a "handshake" mechanism between protocols.

View OriginalReply0