2025-12-24 11:31:13

Galaxy analyst brings up an interesting angle on Bitcoin's price milestone: while BTC hit $126K, once you adjust for inflation and measure it in 2020 dollar equivalents, that peak actually comes to roughly $99,848. So technically, Bitcoin still hasn't broken through the $100K barrier when you account for currency devaluation. It's one of those perspective shifts that makes you rethink what 'all-time high' really means in real terms.

BTC3,27%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FadCatcher

· 2025-12-26 22:20

Bro, this angle is amazing. These guys in the crypto circle hype up 126K every day, but actually, based on purchasing power, it's just over 99K. It cracks me up.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 2025-12-26 11:25

Adjusted for inflation, it didn't break 100,000? So the 126k I was bragging about earlier was all for nothing, haha.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 2025-12-25 03:38

Haha, this perspective is amazing. Crypto enthusiasts love playing this kind of number game the most.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 2025-12-24 12:00

Haha, this logic is all over the place, feels like they're brainwashing us.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 2025-12-24 11:53

Haha, this perspective is indeed sharp. Once inflation cuts down this sword, Bitcoin won't be so arrogant anymore.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 2025-12-24 11:42

Haha, this perspective is a bit extreme. People in the crypto world really dislike hearing this kind of thing.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 2025-12-24 11:36

Haha, this logic is a bit extreme... After inflation adjustment, 126K becomes 99K, so doesn't that mean our ATH has actually never truly arrived?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 2025-12-24 11:31

nah this is exactly the kind of statistical sleight of hand that drives me up the wall tbh... like yeah, inflation-adjusted numbers are *technically* more rigorous, but everyone knows what they mean when they say $126K ATH. you don't get to retroactively move the goalposts just because the math checks out differently, know what i'm saying?

Reply0