2025-12-24 14:22:39

Dogecoin's issuance logic is often misunderstood. An annual fixed issuance of about 5 billion coins, with an additional 16 billion coins within the rules framework — this is the source of miner rewards.

Issuance itself is not the problem; supply-side pressure is a short-term reality. But in the long run, what truly determines price trends are two key factors:

First, whether demand can keep up. The expansion of payment scenarios like Tesla and X platform represents how close Dogecoin is to real-world applications. Second, the ecosystem and consensus. As long as the community and application ecosystem continue to grow, regular issuance cannot fundamentally shake the foundation.

Rather than fixating on the issuance numbers, it’s better to focus on its adoption progress in real business scenarios. That is the true reference for judging long-term value.

DOGE-1.51%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

4am_degen

· 3h ago

That's right, there's always been someone predicting inflation, but they just haven't understood the essence of supply and demand. It should have been explained this way from the start—Bitcoin also has mining rewards, and the issue has never been about the issuance amount. Real-world adoption is the key, and there has been no progress on Tesla's side. Once consensus is reached, no matter how much is issued, it won't be enough. Instead of worrying about inflation, it's better to focus on whether people are actually using it.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 4h ago

That's right. Instead of obsessing over inflation data every day, it's better to see how things are progressing with Musk's real-world projects.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-83070f95

· 12-24 15:49

For currency non-issuance, it is self-limiting; the annual loss or stagnation is far more than just the issue of new currency.

View OriginalReply0

DAOplomacy

· 12-24 14:52

ngl the whole "inflation isn't real if adoption keeps pace" argument has some non-trivial game theoretical implications... but historically precedent suggests stakeholders get real comfortable with that narrative until they don't, ya know?

Reply0

ForumMiningMaster

· 12-24 14:47

Honestly, the issue of issuance expansion has been demonized by everyone; it's basically just miners' earnings. The core still depends on the application scenario. Does Tesla really need it? 50 billion a year sounds like a lot, but if someone is actually using it, it's not a big deal at all. Instead of obsessing over the numbers, it's better to see what Doge has expanded in the payment sector this year. For coins without real demand, issuing an extra one is pointless. The key is whether the consensus still exists—that's the true moat.

View OriginalReply0

BlockImposter

· 12-24 14:43

Instead of worrying about the issuance numbers, focus on its adoption progress in real business scenarios. That is the true reference for judging long-term value. My comment: That's right, if Elon Musk really starts using Dogecoin, then any issuance increase won't be an issue.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandSister

· 12-24 14:39

That's right. Instead of constantly watching the issuance data, it's better to see when Elon Musk will actually start using Dogecoin.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian