The optimization direction of the fee pool design is worth paying attention to. Some projects are building reward distribution mechanisms based on coin holding weight rather than popularity—this design allows participants' long-term contributions to be genuinely rewarded, rather than short-term hype. Meanwhile, the transparency verification mechanism at the social layer is also evolving, showcasing the actual influence of holders through on-chain data. The combined effects of these mechanisms are quite interesting: as quarterly updates proceed, yields accumulate in a compounded manner. The weight incentive model + social verification layer + periodic compounding—this combination could be an important direction for future DeFi ecosystem incentive design.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RiddleMaster
· 2025-12-27 17:07
Someone finally explained this logic clearly. The weighting model is really much better than the popularity list; otherwise, it would just become a hot potato game.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 2025-12-26 11:28
To be honest, the logic of weight incentives sounds appealing, but the key still depends on execution.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 2025-12-24 17:49
Someone finally explained this logic clearly. The weight distribution is much more reliable than hype-driven speculation. I'm just worried that the project team might still cut corners in the end.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 2025-12-24 17:45
This mechanism sounds good, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Most are still just theoretical plans.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 2025-12-24 17:45
Well, this set of logic sounds good, but how many projects can truly be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 2025-12-24 17:42
Hmm, this set of logic sounds good, but how many projects can truly stick to their weight without being hijacked by popularity...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 2025-12-24 17:35
Hmm... That's true, but very few projects can actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 2025-12-24 17:29
It should have been designed this way long ago. Finally, someone is starting to reflect on the emptiness of the hype economy.
The optimization direction of the fee pool design is worth paying attention to. Some projects are building reward distribution mechanisms based on coin holding weight rather than popularity—this design allows participants' long-term contributions to be genuinely rewarded, rather than short-term hype. Meanwhile, the transparency verification mechanism at the social layer is also evolving, showcasing the actual influence of holders through on-chain data. The combined effects of these mechanisms are quite interesting: as quarterly updates proceed, yields accumulate in a compounded manner. The weight incentive model + social verification layer + periodic compounding—this combination could be an important direction for future DeFi ecosystem incentive design.