You'd think we'd call it quits, but nope—here we are, locked in endless debates about which token's fundamentals are actually superior, even though both are bleeding red and down 70%. The mental gymnastics are real. We've mastered the art of spinning losses into "long-term vision" and "diamond hands patience." Defense mode activated, passion at maximum. It's almost impressive how creative we get when justifying a portfolio disaster.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiVeteran
· 2025-12-27 15:21
It's already down 70%, and you're still arguing with each other here. It cracks me up.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 2025-12-27 10:00
Haha, this is the daily life of crypto. Even after crashing to the dogs, still arguing over which token is better...
---
No, even after losing 70%, still arguing about which token is more awesome. That mindset is truly hopeless.
---
diamond hands patience😅 sounds nice, but actually it’s just being trapped and having no way out.
---
We are really geniuses, able to turn liquidation into "long-term positioning," incredible.
---
Full defensive mode but the moat is shrinking, I think I’ve realized something.
---
Remember I used to do that too, losing money and loving to tell stories. I really believed it back then.
---
Is this article talking about me...? It’s so heart-wrenching.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 2025-12-25 00:51
Haha, really, losing 70% and still arguing about fundamentals. Our group really has a lot of imagination.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 2025-12-24 19:55
NGL, this is my weekly routine. Both coins are dead, yet I'm still stubbornly holding on and hoping for a turnaround.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 2025-12-24 19:55
Are the 70% decline still debated in terms of fundamentals? I looked at the on-chain data, and there's an issue with this whale transfer pattern; it's obvious that someone is dumping.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 2025-12-24 19:54
lol This is our daily routine—the art of self-deception, masters.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 2025-12-24 19:54
Haha, really, losing 70% and still arguing about fundamentals, I have to admire this train of thought.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 2025-12-24 19:50
Still arguing over which coin has a better fundamentals after dropping 70%? This mindset is unbelievable, I'm truly speechless.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 2025-12-24 19:45
well, *actually* if you examine the tokenomics through proper game theory lens, both projects fundamentally failed at nash equilibrium... but sure, let's pretend the "vision" matters when liquidity evaporated. the cope is real ngl
You'd think we'd call it quits, but nope—here we are, locked in endless debates about which token's fundamentals are actually superior, even though both are bleeding red and down 70%. The mental gymnastics are real. We've mastered the art of spinning losses into "long-term vision" and "diamond hands patience." Defense mode activated, passion at maximum. It's almost impressive how creative we get when justifying a portfolio disaster.