AI has long since upgraded beyond simple question-and-answer machines. They can now retrieve information independently, perform data comparisons, decompose solutions, set priorities, and even output conclusions directly. The problem is that the current internet ecosystem hasn't kept pace with this evolution.
The internet, payment systems, and blockchain we use today are all designed around human operation habits: clicking a confirmation button, entering a password, waiting for a block to be packaged and confirmed. These processes enhance security for humans, but for AI, they become deadly brakes.
Imagine a high-performance F1 racing engine being forced onto a rugged country road. The issue isn't the engine's capability but the infrastructure can't keep up.
When I first seriously studied the Kite project, I realized: finally, someone is directly addressing this pain point.
Kite's approach is straightforward. It doesn't make minor tweaks within the existing system framework but instead opens a dedicated fast lane for AI agents. This is a public chain born for machine-to-machine interaction. The development tools are familiar, friendly to developers, but the underlying architecture is built entirely around the logic that "AI will execute concurrently and make decisions simultaneously."
On this chain, communication, settlement, and transfers between two agents almost have no concept of "waiting." For AI, latency isn't just a poor experience; it directly causes transaction opportunities to expire. For example, if an agent detects a scarce resource, and cannot instantly lock in payment, the entire judgment process is wasted.
The most noteworthy core innovation of Kite isn't just speed improvement but the realization of true autonomous agent payments. Fund flows no longer need to go through manual approval and confirmation steps. This opens up a whole new realm of possibilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWell
· 2025-12-27 13:13
Oh no, this is the real pain point! The previous arguments about the "blockchain revolution" are still designing for humanity, which is truly the wrong approach.
AI agent autonomous payments are indeed interesting, but I just want to ask—who do you trust to regulate these machines? Could it end up becoming a new black hole of risk?
Kite's approach indeed bypasses the tedious human confirmation process, it feels like someone finally thought of giving machines a dedicated lane. But to be honest, infrastructure lagging behind AI is no longer news; the key is who can truly make this work.
I just want to understand, how are the security mechanisms designed for this kind of M2M on-chain interaction? Pure speed stacking without checks and balances—wouldn't that just give hackers a "fast lane"?
If Kite can solve this part, it’s definitely worth paying attention to. But right now, there are many projects that sound good on paper; we should wait and see the real data after implementation.
I like the idea, but remain skeptical. That’s my stance.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 2025-12-27 09:31
This F1 engine analogy is perfect; indeed, all chains are now dancing to the rhythm of humans.
As for autonomous payments... if we can truly trust AI to handle transfers on its own, that would indeed be a game changer.
But honestly, whether M2M public chains like Kite can truly be implemented depends on the actual execution—no more PPT car manufacturing.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 2025-12-26 14:03
ngl, the F1 engine metaphor is cute but taxonomically oversimplified—latency isn't actually the bottleneck here, it's the cryptographic verification overhead that matters. per my analysis, kite's claim about "autonomous agent payments" needs serious scrutiny on the security model side.
Reply0
WalletWhisperer
· 2025-12-26 02:39
Wow, finally someone has thoroughly explained the real dilemma of AI. It's not that AI doesn't work; it's really the infrastructure bottleneck that's just too outrageous.
Wait, about autonomous payment for agents... Without strict risk control mechanisms, wouldn't that open the door for malicious code?
Kite's approach is indeed clever, but the problem is that right now there are too many projects claiming to "optimize for AI," and in the end, it's all just a scam to get funding. It depends on actual performance.
The analogy of an F1 engine running on a country road is brilliant. Who thought of this?
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 2025-12-24 22:51
Wow, AI autonomous payments are really pushing the limits. If this gets widespread, the traditional financial approval processes will become obsolete.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 2025-12-24 22:45
Wow, AI autonomous payments are really coming, this is interesting.
The F1 engine analogy is perfect; the current chain design is indeed a piece of junk.
I respect Kite's logic—machines deal directly with machines, no need to ask human "dad."
Latency is a fatal flaw for AI agents; finally someone understands.
It feels like we're redefining what belongs on-chain—this chain isn't designed for humans.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 2025-12-24 22:44
From a technical perspective, this logic is a bit overly idealized. AI autonomous payments sound great, but how is risk control handled in reality? Who will bear the cost if abnormal transactions occur?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 2025-12-24 22:44
Missed another good project, oh my goodness
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 2025-12-24 22:39
Wow, AI autonomous payment really unlocks new imagination!
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalk
· 2025-12-24 22:26
Damn, is AI autonomous payment really coming? It feels like blockchain has finally found its use case.
I have to admit, this logic is impressive. Human-designed chains are indeed a burden for AI.
Kite's idea has some potential, but we'll see if it can truly be implemented later on.
Direct transfers machine to machine—just thinking about it is a bit exciting. How will security be ensured?
The F1 engine analogy is perfect; infrastructure upgrades are the real breakthrough.
Autonomous payments seem a bit risky; the potential risks are quite significant.
Finally, a project dares to confront this issue head-on. Looking forward to the next developments.
Blockchain has been tied up by humans for so long; it's time to loosen the reins for AI.
If this really happens, transaction speeds could directly disrupt traditional finance with a dimensionality reduction attack.
AI has long since upgraded beyond simple question-and-answer machines. They can now retrieve information independently, perform data comparisons, decompose solutions, set priorities, and even output conclusions directly. The problem is that the current internet ecosystem hasn't kept pace with this evolution.
The internet, payment systems, and blockchain we use today are all designed around human operation habits: clicking a confirmation button, entering a password, waiting for a block to be packaged and confirmed. These processes enhance security for humans, but for AI, they become deadly brakes.
Imagine a high-performance F1 racing engine being forced onto a rugged country road. The issue isn't the engine's capability but the infrastructure can't keep up.
When I first seriously studied the Kite project, I realized: finally, someone is directly addressing this pain point.
Kite's approach is straightforward. It doesn't make minor tweaks within the existing system framework but instead opens a dedicated fast lane for AI agents. This is a public chain born for machine-to-machine interaction. The development tools are familiar, friendly to developers, but the underlying architecture is built entirely around the logic that "AI will execute concurrently and make decisions simultaneously."
On this chain, communication, settlement, and transfers between two agents almost have no concept of "waiting." For AI, latency isn't just a poor experience; it directly causes transaction opportunities to expire. For example, if an agent detects a scarce resource, and cannot instantly lock in payment, the entire judgment process is wasted.
The most noteworthy core innovation of Kite isn't just speed improvement but the realization of true autonomous agent payments. Fund flows no longer need to go through manual approval and confirmation steps. This opens up a whole new realm of possibilities.