When deploying automation scripts on a VPS, if sensitive data such as wallet private keys are involved, security measures cannot be compromised. It is recommended to set up IP whitelisting restrictions at the VPS firewall level, allowing only specific IP addresses to access, which can significantly reduce the risk of scanning and intrusion. A safer approach is to build a jump server architecture—using one VPS as an intermediary node to connect to the production server that stores critical data, adding an extra layer of isolation.
Be cautious with cloud services as well. Platforms like AWS or Lightsail must enable two-factor authentication—don't consider it a hassle. If the account is compromised, the losses could be astronomical.
Another detail: if you're using AI tools like Claude or Codex not through the official API directly, but via third-party relay services, be especially careful—don't test or debug with sensitive information, as there is a real risk of interception during the relay process.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainPoet
· 01-03 07:27
Private keys should really be handled carefully when stored on a VPS, or you might not even realize when they get scanned. The jump server architecture is indeed reliable; adding an extra layer of isolation provides additional security.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 01-02 12:58
Storing private keys in the cloud is just asking for trouble; there's nothing more to say. I audited at least thirty projects using the jump server architecture back in the day, and only a few did it well... Most still have permission controls that are essentially useless.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 01-02 05:54
Damn it, do I have to tell you not to put private keys randomly? I've seen too many people get their accounts wiped out. The jump server architecture really needs to be implemented properly.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 2025-12-31 19:50
Storing private keys on a VPS without whitelist protection is really asking for trouble. I've seen too many painful lessons.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 2025-12-31 19:45
Storing private keys on a VPS without setting up a firewall takes a lot of guts... The jump server trick is really effective; once you've used it once, there's no turning back.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 2025-12-31 19:44
Private keys on the server? Bro, aren't you asking for trouble? You need to set up multiple layers of isolation. The jump server architecture is perfect.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 2025-12-31 19:38
Private keys stored on VPS are all warriors; the jump server is the basic operation. Don't believe it? Just look at how many all-in-one accounts suddenly got emptied on the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 2025-12-31 19:33
Bro, storing your private key in the cloud and not enabling 2FA? You're just handing it over to hackers in one step...
When deploying automation scripts on a VPS, if sensitive data such as wallet private keys are involved, security measures cannot be compromised. It is recommended to set up IP whitelisting restrictions at the VPS firewall level, allowing only specific IP addresses to access, which can significantly reduce the risk of scanning and intrusion. A safer approach is to build a jump server architecture—using one VPS as an intermediary node to connect to the production server that stores critical data, adding an extra layer of isolation.
Be cautious with cloud services as well. Platforms like AWS or Lightsail must enable two-factor authentication—don't consider it a hassle. If the account is compromised, the losses could be astronomical.
Another detail: if you're using AI tools like Claude or Codex not through the official API directly, but via third-party relay services, be especially careful—don't test or debug with sensitive information, as there is a real risk of interception during the relay process.