The dead internet theory, but make it about Twitter: you scroll through your feed and half the responses are just creative word combinations that technically sound English but don't mean anything. Somehow those posts still get thousands of likes and retweets. Makes you wonder what percentage of engagement is actually real conversation versus people just throwing together plausible-sounding phrases to chase clout. The crypto community definitely isn't immune to this phenomenon—happens constantly in Discord servers and Twitter threads too. At what point does the noise drown out the actual signal?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAll
· 01-06 23:42
NGL, this is the real picture of the current crypto scene. It's all just flashy buzzwords that sound impressive, no one cares what they actually mean.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-05 21:49
ngl I've read too many of these empty talk posts, and it's really hard to tell who is genuinely discussing crypto and who is just talking nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 01-04 11:56
Really, lately scrolling through Twitter feels like watching a random word generator. A bunch of marketing accounts using AI to piece together sentences, and they still get a few thousand likes. Unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 01-04 11:55
ngl Now scrolling through Twitter, it's all just hollow words pieced together, and there are tons of likes. I really can't tell which ones are real people and which are bots.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRider
· 01-04 11:55
ngl That's why I'm finding Twitter more and more boring to scroll through now... A bunch of hollow words just to rack up likes.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 01-04 11:34
Bro, on-chain data doesn't lie, but there are more lying bots on Twitter than real people. I've seen through it long ago; those "buidl," "hodl," "gm" combos on Discord can be written by anyone, but the real on-chain signals are drowned out. That's why I only watch the movements of big wallet addresses; all other voices are noise.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 01-04 11:34
Honestly, now the number of likes is just imaginary. Bots and marketing accounts have long drowned out the real voices.
The dead internet theory, but make it about Twitter: you scroll through your feed and half the responses are just creative word combinations that technically sound English but don't mean anything. Somehow those posts still get thousands of likes and retweets. Makes you wonder what percentage of engagement is actually real conversation versus people just throwing together plausible-sounding phrases to chase clout. The crypto community definitely isn't immune to this phenomenon—happens constantly in Discord servers and Twitter threads too. At what point does the noise drown out the actual signal?