2026-01-04 17:26:46

Snowball implements an interesting token model—leveraging buyback mechanisms funded by creator fees to sustain the ecosystem. What's noteworthy here is the cross-platform token pegging tech at its core. Rather than relying on traditional collateral, this approach integrates multiple chains' liquidity through a novel fee structure. It's a fresh take on how projects can maintain token stability while rewarding the creator community. BOMP represents this new wave of cross-platform tokenomics solutions gaining traction in the space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOplomacy

· 01-07 17:04

ngl the cross-chain liquidity angle is theoretically elegant but like... has anyone actually stress-tested this under market duress? historically these "novel fee structures" tend to have non-trivial externalities nobody foresaw

Reply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-06 11:04

Cross-chain liquidity integration sounds good, but where is the actual fee model data? I need to see on-chain evidence.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 01-04 19:28

Can cross-chain liquidity really stay stable? It still seems to depend on subsequent execution capability.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 01-04 17:56

Speaking of this token model, it's quite interesting—a combination of buyback + creator fees... But the key is whether that cross-platform pegging technology works or not. Multi-chain liquidity integration sounds good, but can it really stabilize the token price... Continuing to observe.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard