2026-01-04 17:28:13

Clean mechanics from day one. Zero external funding backing this—it's purely community-driven. Market making stays authentic, no paid liquidity farms distorting the order book. The dev team doesn't clip a fee on every transaction. Most importantly, there's no insider advantage here. When you're trading on a truly level playing field, that changes everything about how the game gets played.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SigmaValidator

· 01-07 09:30

Really? The dev doesn't take a fee? There are still such considerate projects these days.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 01-07 01:37

A truly fair arena of competition—that's what I want to see. Developers who don't cut the leeks are really rare.

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 01-06 09:06

No insider advantage? Brother, that sounds really nice to hear. How credible is it?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-04 17:57

This is what a true public chain should look like. It's really rare to see no VC daddy harvesting profits.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-04 17:49

I've heard this kind of rhetoric before. The group in 2018 also said the same thing. So, what was the result? Community-driven sounds good, but once the token price drops, it's "community autonomy failure," and in the end, it's still the project team that makes the decisions. No external funding? That makes it even more dangerous. When a black swan event occurs, who will come to the rescue?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk