Bitcoin’s predictable four-year market rhythm continues to prove resilient, but the engine driving this cycle has fundamentally shifted. According to 10x Research’s analysis, geopolitical events and US electoral dynamics now carry more weight than the blockchain’s programmed supply cuts—a critical recalibration of how traders should interpret the market’s natural rhythms.
The Old Driver Is Losing Steam
Historically, Bitcoin’s halving events—when block rewards drop by 50%—served as the primary catalyst for the four-year boom-and-bust cycle. Traders timed positions around these supply shocks, creating predictable momentum windows. But 10x Research Director Markus Thielen argues this model has aged poorly in recent years. The firm’s findings reveal that political cycles, global monetary policy shifts, and institutional capital flows now dominate price action far more than the mechanical scarcity narrative suggests.
What’s Replacing Halving as Bitcoin’s Main Driver?
Three major forces now steer the Bitcoin ship:
Political developments - Elections, regulatory pronouncements, and geopolitical tensions create liquidity waves that dwarf halving-related hype.
Fed policy and global liquidity - Interest rate decisions ripple through risk assets faster than any blockchain event. When central banks tighten, Bitcoin often struggles despite long-term scarcity benefits.
Institutional caution - Despite the Fed’s recent rate cuts, major players remain risk-averse. Macro uncertainty keeps big money on the sidelines, dampening any automatic upside from lower interest rates.
Why Bitcoin Stumbled Despite Rate Cuts
The puzzle many observers face: if the Fed is cutting rates, shouldn’t Bitcoin rally? The answer reveals why 10x Research’s updated framework matters. Institutional investors remain gun-shy amid macroeconomic fog. They’re not reacting to textbook stimulus signals—they’re waiting for clearer political and economic clarity. Halving enthusiasm alone can’t overcome genuine caution from the players who now move markets.
The New Playbook
Bitcoin’s four-year cycle isn’t broken, but its mechanics have transformed. Traders betting solely on halving catalysts while ignoring electoral calendars and central bank moves are operating with yesterday’s map. The cycle lives on—just powered by different dynamics than the early blockchain era suggested.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Political Winds, Not Halving Events: Why Bitcoin's Four-Year Cycle Still Holds Sway
Bitcoin’s predictable four-year market rhythm continues to prove resilient, but the engine driving this cycle has fundamentally shifted. According to 10x Research’s analysis, geopolitical events and US electoral dynamics now carry more weight than the blockchain’s programmed supply cuts—a critical recalibration of how traders should interpret the market’s natural rhythms.
The Old Driver Is Losing Steam
Historically, Bitcoin’s halving events—when block rewards drop by 50%—served as the primary catalyst for the four-year boom-and-bust cycle. Traders timed positions around these supply shocks, creating predictable momentum windows. But 10x Research Director Markus Thielen argues this model has aged poorly in recent years. The firm’s findings reveal that political cycles, global monetary policy shifts, and institutional capital flows now dominate price action far more than the mechanical scarcity narrative suggests.
What’s Replacing Halving as Bitcoin’s Main Driver?
Three major forces now steer the Bitcoin ship:
Political developments - Elections, regulatory pronouncements, and geopolitical tensions create liquidity waves that dwarf halving-related hype.
Fed policy and global liquidity - Interest rate decisions ripple through risk assets faster than any blockchain event. When central banks tighten, Bitcoin often struggles despite long-term scarcity benefits.
Institutional caution - Despite the Fed’s recent rate cuts, major players remain risk-averse. Macro uncertainty keeps big money on the sidelines, dampening any automatic upside from lower interest rates.
Why Bitcoin Stumbled Despite Rate Cuts
The puzzle many observers face: if the Fed is cutting rates, shouldn’t Bitcoin rally? The answer reveals why 10x Research’s updated framework matters. Institutional investors remain gun-shy amid macroeconomic fog. They’re not reacting to textbook stimulus signals—they’re waiting for clearer political and economic clarity. Halving enthusiasm alone can’t overcome genuine caution from the players who now move markets.
The New Playbook
Bitcoin’s four-year cycle isn’t broken, but its mechanics have transformed. Traders betting solely on halving catalysts while ignoring electoral calendars and central bank moves are operating with yesterday’s map. The cycle lives on—just powered by different dynamics than the early blockchain era suggested.