A recent phenomenon has been dominating the crypto scene—Bitcoin in the US market has experienced negative premium for 21 consecutive days. This is not just small fluctuations; it signals a collapse of the entire narrative framework.
Let's start with the basics. What does negative premium in Bitcoin mean? It means that the Bitcoin price in the compliant market is actually lower than the global average price. This sounds counterintuitive. Historically, the US market has been known for mature regulation and strict risk control, so investors are usually willing to pay a premium for this "safety." Now, however, with a continuous discount for 21 days, the underlying logic is clear: all those once-blown-up stories are now fading into obscurity.
Looking back at last year's frenzy. Bitcoin's price once approached 120,000. How hot was the narrative at that time?
The four-year cycle of mining reward halving was depicted as an inevitable surge; the approval of US spot ETFs was met with cheers of "institutional money rushing in"; there were even rumors that the US government would include Bitcoin in its strategic reserves, directly comparing it to gold. So, what’s the situation now?
The halving indeed happened, but miners had already stockpiled coins in advance to hedge, turning what should have been a positive into a negative. The ETF launch is real, but now it looks more like a "channel for institutions to buy at high levels and then collectively exit"—since there are now cheaper, compliant products, who would still pay for those old high-fee products? As for the strategic reserve talk, it’s just a fairy tale woven by capital; no policy draft has even appeared.
How cold is the market now? Trading volume has shrunk to an unbearable level. It’s not just a price decline; it’s a complete exhaustion of the entire ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 01-05 19:52
It's the same story of halving, ETF, and strategic reserves again. It was hyped up so much last year, and now the backlash hurts even more.
The pattern is still the same; institutions take the profits and then disappear.
A 21-day negative premium indicates what? It just means no one believes anymore.
Honestly, this round of "narrative" is really disappointing, nothing new.
Bitcoin has always been like this; when the hype dies down, it relies on stories, and when the story collapses, it waits for the next cycle.
ETF is indeed a tool for taking over, now you see it clearly.
The point about the ecosystem's vitality being exhausted is valid; trading volume can't even support it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 01-05 19:50
21 days of negative premium? This is the footprint of institutions fleeing
A bunch of nonsense stories last year, now everything has collapsed
Honestly, halving, ETFs, strategic reserves... all are scams to fool retail investors
Now trading volume is shrinking, indicating everyone is losing confidence
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-05 19:46
I've already said that this wave would have a correction. Do you only understand now? I was warning people to control risks last year, yet many are still hyping the halving myth. Institutions cut the leeks and then run away— isn't that very normal?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 01-05 19:45
It's the same narrative of collapse every time, saying the same thing last year too.
I believe institutions are buying at high levels, but is the trading volume really shrinking?
Ultimately, it's just that they can't make money anymore, so don't pretend to be so sophisticated.
The negative premium lasting for 21 days is indeed interesting, but is this a bottom signal?
When it was 120,000 last year, no one said it was collapsing; now that it has fallen, everyone is pessimistic. This old story is tired.
I've long known that the halving positive effect is a lie; crypto traders have had the coins for a while.
That wave of ETFs was definitely a channel for bagholders; now I finally understand it's too late.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-05 19:30
Another story of "narrative collapse"... Why didn't anyone say this when it was 120,000 last December?
Institutions took over at high levels and exited, old tricks. Are you only realizing it now?
Negative premium collapsed in just 21 days. Where are those who claimed halving would definitely cause a crash?
A recent phenomenon has been dominating the crypto scene—Bitcoin in the US market has experienced negative premium for 21 consecutive days. This is not just small fluctuations; it signals a collapse of the entire narrative framework.
Let's start with the basics. What does negative premium in Bitcoin mean? It means that the Bitcoin price in the compliant market is actually lower than the global average price. This sounds counterintuitive. Historically, the US market has been known for mature regulation and strict risk control, so investors are usually willing to pay a premium for this "safety." Now, however, with a continuous discount for 21 days, the underlying logic is clear: all those once-blown-up stories are now fading into obscurity.
Looking back at last year's frenzy. Bitcoin's price once approached 120,000. How hot was the narrative at that time?
The four-year cycle of mining reward halving was depicted as an inevitable surge; the approval of US spot ETFs was met with cheers of "institutional money rushing in"; there were even rumors that the US government would include Bitcoin in its strategic reserves, directly comparing it to gold. So, what’s the situation now?
The halving indeed happened, but miners had already stockpiled coins in advance to hedge, turning what should have been a positive into a negative. The ETF launch is real, but now it looks more like a "channel for institutions to buy at high levels and then collectively exit"—since there are now cheaper, compliant products, who would still pay for those old high-fee products? As for the strategic reserve talk, it’s just a fairy tale woven by capital; no policy draft has even appeared.
How cold is the market now? Trading volume has shrunk to an unbearable level. It’s not just a price decline; it’s a complete exhaustion of the entire ecosystem.