Secondary market liquidity imbalances triggered the USX de-peg incident recently. The core issue: when stablecoin liquidity fractures across different venues, traders face a tough choice—swap on DEXs and eat massive slippage, or watch your position bleed out.
Here's what should happen instead: protocols should let you redeem the underlying collateral directly, bypassing swap mechanics entirely. This native redemption route keeps you whole even when pool conditions turn ugly.
But not all stablecoin protocols operate this way. Some lack permissionless redemption functionality, leaving users trapped between bad swaps and opportunity cost. That architectural gap matters more than people realize when liquidity gets fragmented.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlash
· 01-06 05:54
The fragmentation of liquidity has long been a warning sign; the USX de-pegging is a textbook-level trigger for liquidation risk.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-05 19:53
Ah, it's the same old story of liquidity fragmentation again. The DEX slippage is really messing with my mindset.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 01-05 19:53
Liquidity fragmentation is a trap; directly redeeming collateral should indeed be a standard move.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 01-05 19:49
Honestly, the USN issue is just a design flaw. You still have to rely on direct redemption to feel secure.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 01-05 19:44
Directly redeem the underlying assets—this move is really brilliant. I'm just worried that some protocols might not even have this feature.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 01-05 19:38
ngl USX's recent move was really uncomfortable; liquidity fragmentation is just so disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 01-05 19:37
The option to directly redeem the underlying assets should have been popularized long ago. It's really outrageous that some protocols still don't support it.
Secondary market liquidity imbalances triggered the USX de-peg incident recently. The core issue: when stablecoin liquidity fractures across different venues, traders face a tough choice—swap on DEXs and eat massive slippage, or watch your position bleed out.
Here's what should happen instead: protocols should let you redeem the underlying collateral directly, bypassing swap mechanics entirely. This native redemption route keeps you whole even when pool conditions turn ugly.
But not all stablecoin protocols operate this way. Some lack permissionless redemption functionality, leaving users trapped between bad swaps and opportunity cost. That architectural gap matters more than people realize when liquidity gets fragmented.