2026-01-06 08:26:13

Crypto for good goes far beyond donations; the core is about returning the right to speak to everyone.

Donations are one-way relief, but stablecoins are different—they are two-way empowerment. A leading stablecoin can preserve value, not only because it is pegged to 1 USD, but also because it breaks through geographical boundaries, allowing anyone to use it to purchase essentials for survival. This is true financial freedom.

Meaningful charity is not about pouring funds onto the ruins of a broken system, but about building a financial infrastructure for those abandoned by the existing financial system—one that will never go offline and can never be unilaterally taken away. This is how Web3 changes the world.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_whisperer

· 01-06 08:56

Sounds good, but can stablecoins really solve that many problems? --- I like the idea of double-sided empowerment; it's much more reliable than traditional charity. --- Returning the right to speak to everyone... the ideal is beautiful, but what about reality? --- Spreading donations on a broken system is indeed a superficial fix; this logic makes sense. --- The key is that someone actually uses it, otherwise it's all pointless. --- So stablecoins are just financial infrastructure? That seems like an overstatement. --- The fact that it cannot be unilaterally deprived really touched me. --- It sounds good, but most people probably don't know how to use stablecoins. --- Finally, someone said it out loud; the traditional donation model indeed needs reform. --- I hadn't thought about the perspective of the right to speak before; interesting.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 01-06 08:55

Sounds good, but are stablecoins really that amazing? How many people have actually used them in real life?

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 01-06 08:54

Sounds good, but how can we ensure that stablecoins actually reach the hands of those in need?

View OriginalReply0

NervousFingers

· 01-06 08:50

The words sound nice, but how many ordinary people truly dare to use stablecoins for daily expenses? There's nothing wrong with what you're saying, but in reality, who actually uses USDC to buy groceries? I understand how bad the system is, but has this infrastructure really been built? Empowerment, empowerment—sounds great, but how difficult is it to implement in practice? Bidirectional empowerment sounds great, but when volatility kicks in, it's still the same old way of harvesting retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-06 08:46

Sounds quite idealistic, but can stablecoins really save people? I think it's more like another way to harvest the little guys.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-06 08:37

It sounds ideal, but can stablecoins really help the abandoned groups? I want to see how they actually use them. What about places without internet? This issue seems to be overlooked. I like this logic, but the threshold is still there. Instead of empowering them, it's better to first enable them to use it; reality is quite harsh. It sounds nice, but most people are still struggling to meet basic needs, so what financial freedom are we talking about?

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper