Federal Reserve power player Neil Kashkari has recently become a hot topic in the crypto community. This guy holds a voting right on monetary policy, with a complex background—he has political ties to Trump and his views on cryptocurrencies directly impact the market.
First, let's talk about his relationship with Trump. Kashkari is from a Republican background and once ran for governor of California as a Republican. In the investment circle, he is even seen as Trump's "most suitable candidate" for the next Federal Reserve Chair. The two share a resonance on monetary policy—Kashkari has been signaling the possibility of rate cuts, which is exactly what Trump wants to hear. However, they are not entirely aligned. In response to Trump's tariff policies, Kashkari has repeatedly sounded the alarm, emphasizing that trade wars will push up inflation, and monetary policy needs to be carefully balanced. He believes that quickly advancing trade agreements is the way to avoid an economic recession.
What the crypto community cares most about is his true attitude towards cryptocurrencies. To put it bluntly, Kashkari is the kind of "opposition" figure. He has explicitly stated that besides speculation tools, cryptocurrencies have little practical use in developed economies and are essentially toys. On regulation, he also takes a firm stance, believing that cryptocurrencies should be regulated by the U.S. SEC and not by the Federal Reserve alone. This clear stance has made crypto investors take his words seriously.
This financial figure, who once led a $700 billion bailout plan, will hold a key voting right as an FOMC voting member by 2026. If he truly becomes the Fed Chair in the future, the impact on the cryptocurrency market might not be good news.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RooftopVIP
· 01-09 12:02
Really, if Kashkari actually takes the position of Federal Reserve Chair, we need to be mentally prepared.
Kashkari treats the crypto world as a toy, this has long been no secret... Wait, he's going to have voting rights in 2026? Do we still have time?
The signals for rate cuts are good, but he opposes the crypto community—what a contradictory character.
Trump can't even influence his attitude towards crypto, it's outrageous.
Should the big players consider deploying now...
This tariff warning is credible, but it's a mortal enemy to crypto—how to choose?
Wait, everyone, the people who are injecting 700 billion to rescue the market are now coming to cut us? This story is really well written.
Compared to rate cuts, I'm more worried about the policies this guy will implement after gaining power—that would be the real killer.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 01-07 18:55
Kashkari is really troublesome. If he truly takes the chairman position, the crypto world will tremble.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 01-07 17:17
If Kashkari really becomes the Federal Reserve Chair, our crypto community will have to band together for warmth.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 01-06 12:52
Kashkari is right, he's just a hype tool... we're still here playing around
---
Trump's favorite has turned into a crypto killer, and this script is pretty brilliant
---
Cut interest rates again and again, talking about wallets gets me excited... let's wait until 2026
---
It's just a toy, anyway I didn't expect it to change the world, making money is the real deal
---
Maybe SEC regulation would be safer? Who trusts the Federal Reserve anyway
---
They've already blown 700 billion, and now they're afraid of our little coins? Laughable
---
These days, telling the truth has become the opposition, it's unbelievable
---
If he really becomes the chairman, the crypto community will probably all cut their wrists again
---
Having a Republican background and aligning with Trump, this routine is even more money-burning than the crypto world
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 01-06 12:47
Toy? Ha, this guy really dares to say that, but let's just wait and see.
If Kashkari really takes the position of Federal Reserve Chair, the crypto circle will need to tighten up.
This guy openly belittles the crypto circle, then turns around to want voting rights, it's uncomfortable.
A rate cut signal is good, but opposing cryptocurrencies is a bit much. What does the SEC say about this?
Wait, is his relationship with Trump really that close? Why is he still warning about tariffs?
The crypto circle needs to be careful this time. When voting rights take effect next year, there might be more volatility.
They call it a toy, but let's show him how the market cap has grown.
With this kind of attitude from someone in power, we can only plan our exit strategy in advance.
Kashkari immediately defines us as a speculation tool. The battle hasn't even started, and we've already lost half the fight.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 01-06 12:42
Kashkari is really a formidable guy; just one word "toy" can cause the coin price to fluctuate, demonstrating strong manipulation power.
If he gains power, we need to be cautious. The signals of interest rate cuts sound comforting, but the stance against crypto remains unwavering.
Basically, he's a fortress of traditional finance that looks down on our system. By 2026, we really need to be on guard.
Trump and he seem to be on the same side, but in reality, they are playing their own games. This kind of uncertainty is the most unsettling.
The warning bells he’s ringing on tariffs and inflation are correct, but his attitude towards coins is outright hostility, leaving no room for negotiation.
Federal Reserve Chair? The impact on the market might be even harsher than you think. The SEC regulation regime is already quite stifling.
Whoever takes the throne this time, it's not looking very promising. The crypto community needs to save itself, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 01-06 12:41
Good morning everyone, it's 2 a.m. and I'm back to mining. Kashkal's rhetoric is basically treating the crypto world as a late-night snack; anyway, when you fall, they can harvest easily. Now that's what I call a true sandwich attack... Voting rights in 2026? Ha, by then, we'll be either stuck in a liquidity trap or fighting gas wars—who knows.
---
This guy is just a rule-maker, looking down from the dark pool, and all retail investors are just pawns. The signals of rate cuts are just bait; the real profit isn't made in the crypto world.
---
Wait, Trump and his tariff battles... that's what I care about. The volatility in the crypto market is coming. Who regulates whom doesn't really matter; in the end, it's us night creatures who suffer.
---
Haha, another "toy theory." Every time power figures say this in history, I can make some pocket money during the midnight arbitrage window. The most sincere opposition is the best to use.
---
The people behind the 700 billion rescue plan now say crypto has no use? That's as ironic as last year's gas wars... a true reflection in the robot paradise, brother.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 01-06 12:39
Kashkari said crypto is a toy, and I find it strange. Why doesn't this guy take a look at the Federal Reserve's model...
---
The rate cut signals are released happily, then immediately countered with tariffs. Who would believe such words?
---
By 2026, holding voting rights in the FOMC, the days of the crypto world might be tough.
---
Honestly, having the opposition come to power might not be a bad thing for us. At least their attitude is clear, unlike those who keep things under wraps, which is more annoying.
---
Crypto is a toy? Then what about printing money? The Federal Reserve's big boss.
---
The "most suitable" candidate in Trump's mind, yet they can still bicker over trade policies. Their relationship is more complicated than it seems.
---
Instead of waiting for him to take office and react, it's better to see now how this person votes. Data speaks.
---
SEC regulation vs. Federal Reserve independent policy, these two routes are vastly different...
---
Kashkari's stance, can it still be so firm in 2026? Don't underestimate the market's ability to educate.
---
The people who bailed out the market with 700 billion now say crypto is useless. Isn't that ironic?
Federal Reserve power player Neil Kashkari has recently become a hot topic in the crypto community. This guy holds a voting right on monetary policy, with a complex background—he has political ties to Trump and his views on cryptocurrencies directly impact the market.
First, let's talk about his relationship with Trump. Kashkari is from a Republican background and once ran for governor of California as a Republican. In the investment circle, he is even seen as Trump's "most suitable candidate" for the next Federal Reserve Chair. The two share a resonance on monetary policy—Kashkari has been signaling the possibility of rate cuts, which is exactly what Trump wants to hear. However, they are not entirely aligned. In response to Trump's tariff policies, Kashkari has repeatedly sounded the alarm, emphasizing that trade wars will push up inflation, and monetary policy needs to be carefully balanced. He believes that quickly advancing trade agreements is the way to avoid an economic recession.
What the crypto community cares most about is his true attitude towards cryptocurrencies. To put it bluntly, Kashkari is the kind of "opposition" figure. He has explicitly stated that besides speculation tools, cryptocurrencies have little practical use in developed economies and are essentially toys. On regulation, he also takes a firm stance, believing that cryptocurrencies should be regulated by the U.S. SEC and not by the Federal Reserve alone. This clear stance has made crypto investors take his words seriously.
This financial figure, who once led a $700 billion bailout plan, will hold a key voting right as an FOMC voting member by 2026. If he truly becomes the Fed Chair in the future, the impact on the cryptocurrency market might not be good news.