2026-01-06 14:10:18

#数字资产动态追踪 Solana ecosystem has new developments. On January 6th, Jito launched the IBRL Explorer tool, which thoroughly exposed the "unspoken rules" behind Solana block construction—operations affecting network stability such as tail packing and Slot Timing Games were all revealed.

This tool is quite interesting. It scores validators using a three-tier evaluation system, not simply judging good or bad, but providing a multi-dimensional precise assessment. An intuitive result is improved block quality, which also boosts network efficiency.

Timing is crucial. The Solana 2026 upgrade is about to roll out. Can this wave of optimization become a turning point to alleviate network congestion? Is a rebound for SOL possible? The potential for ecosystem recovery is indeed there. It still depends on whether these tools can truly change the validators' incentive structures. $SOL

SOL1,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-07 02:01

Haha, finally someone dares to expose the "hidden rules" of Solana. This tool has done a pretty significant thing. It's about time to crack down on those shady practices at the tail end. So frustrating. Looking at Jito's recent moves, it seems like they're trying to work on the incentive mechanism's core. If they can truly change validator behavior, that would be amazing. But honestly, no matter how good the tool is, it still depends on the validators' cooperation. That's the key, right? Before the 2026 upgrade, resolving these issues might really be the chance for SOL to turn things around.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMaster

· 01-06 14:40

Oh no, it's that same old "transparent governance" routine; project teams love to tell this story.

View OriginalReply0

CodeZeroBasis

· 01-06 14:37

Jito's recent move definitely has some substance, exposing all the tricks of the validators. It seems that SOL's comeback will still depend on the incentive mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-06 14:36

Jito's move this time is really tough, exposing all the small tricks of the validators. But to be honest, without changing the incentive structure, no matter how fancy this tool is, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofInThePudding

· 01-06 14:34

Hmm... Jito's recent move is somewhat impressive, but to be honest, I have some doubts about whether those validators will really change the incentive structure.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 01-06 14:30

After research and analysis, this IBRL Explorer seems to solve the problem, but in reality, it still depends on whether the incentive mechanism has truly been reshaped. The tail bundling approach has long been an open secret; the key is whether these three layers of scoring can suppress the greed of major validators—historical data shows that once community governance of projects like SOL fails, even the best tools are useless.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-06 14:16

Another new tool, can the validator incentive structure really be improved? I'm just worried it's another pretty facade with good-looking data, just like Jito's promises during the last gas war that were never fulfilled...

View OriginalReply0