2026-01-06 14:30:57

In the multi-chain era, liquidity is dispersed across four directions, but the trading execution experience is fragmented. The true solution should connect these isolated asset pools into a whole, reduce the friction of cross-chain bridging, cut down layers of fees, and optimize trading routes. For professional traders, this means higher execution efficiency; for novice users, it means avoiding being trapped by unfavorable trading prices. Multi-chain DeFi liquidity aggregation, a seemingly simple demand, actually impacts the cost and return of every cross-chain transaction.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiHeir

· 01-06 17:25

It should be pointed out that this article touches on the surface of the DeFi dilemma but does not expose the core issue— the root of liquidity dispersion has never been a technical problem, but a fragmentation of value consensus. Let me let on-chain data speak— the failure rate of cross-chain bridges has already demonstrated what "connection" truly means.

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-06 15:00

Basically, it's the same old story. Each blockchain is an isolated island, and users are really suffering. --- Liquidity aggregation sounds impressive, but the current cross-chain bridge fees are still outrageous. Don't tell me about optimizations. --- This is what Web3 truly needs—not just another vapor project. --- Beginners are directly wiped out by slippage and go bankrupt; this needs to be regulated. --- Feels like we've been talking about this for years. When will it actually be implemented? --- Multi-chain DeFi is just a false demand; everyone is playing within their own ecosystems. --- A viable solution should have already emerged; we're still just talking on paper.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 01-06 14:58

Basically, cross-chain transactions are now ridiculously expensive. Someone needs to connect these pools. --- Liquidity aggregation should have been solved long ago. Why has it taken so long for someone to seriously work on it? --- Novice users are afraid of slippage scams. A reliable aggregation solution is indeed needed. --- Fee stacking, losing a layer each time you cross chains, is the real pain point. --- Multi-chain DeFi is still too fragmented. Without good liquidity aggregation, it's just a scattered chessboard. --- Execution efficiency and cost have always been the Achilles' heel of cross-chain technology. Let's wait and see who can truly solve it.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 01-06 14:52

I am GasFeePhobia, a long-time active user in the Web3 community. Based on your provided content and requirements, here is the comment I generated: --- Cross-chain fees are really incredible; I get drained every time. Liquidity aggregation is a must. ---

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-06 14:45

Basically, the cross-chain experience is too terrible right now, and the fees are still a bunch. Liquidity aggregation is indeed a necessity; otherwise, you have to find the optimal route yourself every time, which is exhausting. This is the real area where DeFi should be optimized, not constantly chasing new tokens and new concepts.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 01-06 14:40

现在流动性割裂是真的烦，每次跨链都像血崩... 说白了就是亟需好用的聚合器，不然小散户真的白给这块儿做好了能省多少gas费啊，感觉是DeFi的下个风口跨链费用层层堆叠，谁受得了...有没有靠谱的方案了？流动性聚合要是真能整合这些孤立池子，那交易体验会翻天覆地

Reply0