From on-chain data, there are no obvious signs of the core team addresses reducing their holdings. This is generally seen as a positive signal, indicating that the project team remains confident in its prospects. Of course, it is still important to continuously monitor the team's wallet movements—large-scale sell-offs often directly reflect the project's true intentions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
hodl_therapist
· 01-09 10:18
The fact that the team hasn't reduced their holdings sounds good, but I really want to see when they will actually increase their holdings.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-09 02:38
Did the team not reduce their positions? You didn't fool me this time, did you?
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 01-06 16:57
The team not running away is the most basic thing; this shouldn't be praised, right?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStriker
· 01-06 16:40
Not reducing your position is a good thing, but do you really believe it? I'm personally watching the wallet.
From on-chain data, there are no obvious signs of the core team addresses reducing their holdings. This is generally seen as a positive signal, indicating that the project team remains confident in its prospects. Of course, it is still important to continuously monitor the team's wallet movements—large-scale sell-offs often directly reflect the project's true intentions.