2026-01-06 16:40:21

#以太坊大户持仓变化 Dropped another 1,500 points

Yesterday morning, I gave a signal — Bitcoin might adjust to around 93,000. Now the market is holding at 92,800, which is basically in line with the wave theory I previously analyzed.

To be honest, the market has been ongoing. The question is whether you are doing the right things at the right time. In this pullback, some are buying the dip, others are cutting losses.

$BTC is repeatedly testing the key support level, while $ETH and $XRP are also following suit with sideways movements. From a technical perspective, the next step is to see if it can hold above 92,000 — only if it stabilizes can there be a chance for a subsequent rebound.

What is your trading plan?

ETH0,5%

BTC0,34%

XRP-0,19%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketNoodler

· 01-09 01:41

Wave theory once again perfectly illustrates what it means to discuss strategies on paper; being right about predictions isn't as good as copying accurately. Those who cut losses are all regretting, those buying the dip are betting on the next move, the market itself isn't anything new. It's really hard to say when the 92,000 level will be broken.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 01-07 13:48

Both falling and rising, anyway I just bought the dip, betting it will hold steady at 92,000. --- What does wave theory really match? The key is whether it can rebound. --- This round of cutting losses was really painful. I should have just placed an order and waited for the bottom. --- The 92,800 level has been tested repeatedly, it's so frustrating. --- Listening to you, it feels like there's still hope. Keep holding on. --- $BTC$ ETH is just following the trend and swinging around, really exhausting. --- Doing the right thing at the right time sounds simple, but in reality, it can lead to heavy losses. I have deep experience with that. --- If we can't hold the 92,000 line, I will have to run. --- What tricks are the big players playing again? Anyway, retail investors, I'm just waiting for the chance to buy the dip.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 01-06 17:10

Wave theory hit again, this time it's really not a guess. The key is whether 92,000 can hold; if not, then it depends on 90,000. I just don't understand some people; knowing a pullback is coming, they still go all-in. This wave is indeed a paradise for bottom-fishing and a hell for cutting losses. Staying at 92,800 feels like there’s still room for a dip.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-06 17:10

Based on on-chain data, the repeated testing of the 92,800 level is quite interesting—according to historical volatility characteristics, whether the support level can hold directly determines the subsequent risk exposure, and it is worth continuous observation.

View OriginalReply0

StableGenius

· 01-06 17:10

yeah so called "as predicted" crowd really nailing it with the 92800 call... empirically speaking, everyone and their bot saw this coming lol. the real question nobody's asking is whether these support levels even mean anything anymore or if we're just pattern-matching our way into poor decisions.

Reply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-06 17:06

92800, I called it again. This wave theory really isn't just talk.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 01-06 16:57

If only I had looked at your wave theory a bit more yesterday... Now looking at 92,800, I really regret it to the core. Why was I so decisive when cutting losses? When bottom-fishing, I kept smashing downward with a bang. Now I can only pray that it can hold steady at 92k. My trading plan? Well... it's mainly based on the market’s ups and downs, haha.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 01-06 16:51

Is the Elliott Wave Theory accurate again? Why can't I ever pinpoint this moment precisely?

View OriginalReply0