2026-01-06 17:26:09

Many people think that stable returns are just about luck, but in reality, it’s more about how the architecture is designed. Only after trying the USD1 lending model recently did I realize—low-cost capital itself is the strongest multiplier for returns.

The most straightforward idea is this: using top-tier assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB as collateral, borrowing USD1 stablecoins on DeFi lending platforms, with interest rates around 1%. In such a low-interest environment, the stablecoins obtained can be used more broadly—whether for participating in liquidity mining, cross-chain arbitrage, or waiting for better opportunities. Holding cheap capital means holding the initiative. The key is that this process operates completely in a decentralized manner, with no complex approval processes, and the security of blue-chip assets goes without saying.

USD10,02%

BTC-0,67%

ETH-0,62%

BNB1,57%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasWrangler

· 01-09 12:30

technically speaking, if you actually analyze the mechanics here—1% borrow rates aren't the flex people think they are. you're ignoring liquidation risk, oracle manipulation vectors, and the hidden gas overhead eating into your margins. demonstrably sub-optimal positioning imho

Reply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 01-07 22:54

A 1% interest rate sounds good, but the key is whether the risk premium of the lending platform is appropriate, right? There are countless arbitrage strategies in the crypto space, but the ones that truly make money are always those who understand architecture design. Low-cost funds can indeed amplify returns, but the question is who will bear the liquidation risk. This USD1 model sounds a bit like the previous USDC approach, but the details are still quite different. DeFi lending at 1% interest rate... feels much cheaper compared to the bull market period, which is a bit scary. Cheap funds are only a multiplier when the market is good; looking back, it could turn into a leverage trap. Mechanism design does not guarantee 100% stability; it still depends on the actual liquidity and liquidation mechanisms.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-06 17:56

1% lending rate? Sounds pretty good, but I'm worried it might be the next collapse project... --- Low-cost funds are indeed attractive, but the question is, can $1 USD stay stable? --- Interesting, finally someone explained this logic clearly, I was confused before. --- It sounds simple, but how do you control the risks in actual operation? --- Cheap funds sound great, but who bears the volatility risk of collateral? --- That's right, but how long can such arbitrage opportunities last? It always feels like the best things have pitfalls. --- Borrow at 1% interest rate, how much can you earn from mining? How is this calculation done? --- Decentralization is good, but what about slippage and gas fees? Are the costs really low?

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 01-06 17:54

1% lending rate? That's why I've been sticking to DeFi instead of traditional finance, really awesome Holding cheap funds equals gaining the upper hand, this hits the point The USD1 model truly changed the game, I was still worried about risks before, now I understand the core is all about architecture design In a low-interest environment, arbitrage is easy, DeFi should be this straightforward and direct Decentralized operation without approval is really the best, banks can never provide that 1%? I feel like I've been ripped off, is this platform reliable? Cheap funds are productivity, those who seize the opportunity are already making money Cross-chain arbitrage combined with 1% lending, this is the right way to open up It looks simple, but truly understanding the architecture design is rare I'm confident in using blue-chip assets as collateral, just worried about platform issues This move is really hardcore, I’ll try USD1 lending too

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 01-06 17:50

A 1% interest rate is indeed nice, but those who truly make money are the ones who lend out their idle funds to continue earning. Borrowing coins is easy to get liquidated, but it still depends on position management. Low-interest funds sound good, but the question is when DeFi can truly operate stably. Good architecture design but risks are always present. Don't just look at the returns and ignore the liquidation line. That's why some people earn millions a month while others get liquidated. The difference with the same tools is really big.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-06 17:47

1% interest rate? Easy to say, but how many can truly reliably withdraw funds? Collateral prices suddenly plummet, and liquidation with leverage can happen in just minutes. Low cost doesn't mean zero risk, brother. How much has the arbitrage space been squeezed? This round feels like a reactionary move done after the fact.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainArchaeologist

· 01-06 17:45

1% interest rate is really, but if you use it for arbitrage, it feels like it can't beat the gas fees. 2. The low-cost capital multiplier sounds great, but what about liquidation risk? No one wants to talk about it. 3. Decentralized approval is fast, but who will save you when the market crashes? That's the real danger. 4. Borrow stablecoins and then earn the spread by circulating in DeFi—it's just another way to leverage. 5. A 1% interest rate is indeed noticeable, but I'm afraid when liquidity dries up, everyone will have to run. 6. This logic is just a nested doll; low interest is just a number on paper. 7. Using BNB as collateral to borrow USD1—just thinking about a sudden price crash keeps me awake. 8. Cheap capital sounds like a gimmick, but it all depends on how much real profit you can make. 9. Fully decentralized operation, but when problems occur, there's nowhere to cry—this is a trap. 10. Liquidity mining has been common for years; I heard this five years ago.

View OriginalReply0