Walrus Protocol's token WAL has recently attracted a lot of discussion, mainly because its economic model is relatively rigid.
In terms of use cases, the platform's annual storage consumption is about 365 million WAL, which is a real consumption. Node participants can earn an APY of 18%-25%, providing genuine motivation. Plus, governance voting rights allow participants to influence parameter adjustments. These three aspects basically cover the core needs.
On the supply side, the project has set up a dual deflationary mechanism—storage consumption plus staking lock-up, both continuously reducing supply. On the demand side, the AI and NFT sectors are about to explode, and the demand for on-chain data storage will only grow.
Therefore, in the long term, WAL still has room to rise. It mainly depends on whether this model can truly be operationalized and the market's actual conversion of storage demand.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PriceOracleFairy
· 01-08 05:13
ngl the dual-deflation mechanics here hit different... 365m wal annual burn isn't just vibes, that's actual sink velocity we can model. curious if the 18-25% apy staking holds up once normalization kicks in tho
Reply0
PumpingCroissant
· 01-08 01:54
The dual deflationary logic sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be paper wealth again.
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 01-07 01:24
Double deflation sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 01-06 21:51
The dual deflation logic sounds good, but how many projects can truly be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 01-06 21:45
Oh wow, double deflation + real demand, this logic really has some substance to it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 01-06 21:42
actually if you read the tokenomics... 365M WAL annual burn sounds good on paper but we've seen this movie before lol. double deflation narratives always look clean until vesting unlocks hit different
Reply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-06 21:31
Oh no, the logic of double deflation sounds really hardcore, but I'm afraid the reality might be quite different from the ideal.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 01-06 21:30
Hmm... Double deflation sounds good, but I'm worried it's just empty talk. How many can really get off the ground?
Walrus Protocol's token WAL has recently attracted a lot of discussion, mainly because its economic model is relatively rigid.
In terms of use cases, the platform's annual storage consumption is about 365 million WAL, which is a real consumption. Node participants can earn an APY of 18%-25%, providing genuine motivation. Plus, governance voting rights allow participants to influence parameter adjustments. These three aspects basically cover the core needs.
On the supply side, the project has set up a dual deflationary mechanism—storage consumption plus staking lock-up, both continuously reducing supply. On the demand side, the AI and NFT sectors are about to explode, and the demand for on-chain data storage will only grow.
Therefore, in the long term, WAL still has room to rise. It mainly depends on whether this model can truly be operationalized and the market's actual conversion of storage demand.