TL;DR
· Bitcoin fell to near $65,500 in early June over two days, with the crypto market cap evaporating about $200 billion.
· Strategy sold 32 BTC worth approximately $2.5 million, which based on major exchange trading volume alone, can hardly explain the crash.
· Combined with consecutive ETF outflows, Mt.Gox transfers, and leveraged long liquidations, the rebound remains suppressed by capital diversion.

In early June, Bitcoin briefly fell below $66,000, retracing about 10% over two days. The market quickly pointed fingers at Michael Saylor-led Strategy, citing the company's sale of 32 Bitcoin in late May. But in terms of scale, this roughly $2.5 million sale is more like noise and can hardly explain the approximately $200 billion crypto market cap evaporation. What truly drove prices lower was the consecutive redemption from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, selling pressure expectations triggered by large Mt.Gox transfers, and the chain reaction of highly leveraged long positions being liquidated en masse. Meanwhile, AI financing and large-cap tech assets continued to attract risk capital, with crypto assets facing a more concentrated reduction in exposure.

32 BTC Cannot Drive a Global Sell-Off

The easiest narrative to spread around this decline is "Saylor sells coins, market crashes." But trading volume does not support this causal chain.

According to reports from The Block and Coindesk, Strategy sold 32 BTC between May 26 and 31, 2026, worth approximately $2.5 million, at an average price of about $77,135. For a company long known for its high-profile Bitcoin holdings, this move has symbolic significance, but in terms of market liquidity, it's very small.

The average daily spot trading volume of Bitcoin on major exchanges is typically in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Roughly calculated at the time, selling 32 BTC spread over five trading days accounts for a negligible proportion of daily spot volume, akin to a larger investor reducing positions rather than a sell order capable of changing the global Bitcoin price.

The price fluctuation itself was much larger. In early June, Bitcoin first dropped about $4,500 in a single day, then continued to decline during Asian and European trading sessions, hitting around $65,500 intraday, a low not seen since late March. Ethereum also briefly fell below $1,900, and Strategy-related stocks came under pressure simultaneously.

Attributing the decline to 32 BTC is more like the market finding an easy-to-understand label after the fact. The real question is why more capital chose to exit crypto assets at the same time.

ETF Redemptions and Mt.Gox Transfers First Depressed Expectations

The first layer of pressure in early June came from the spot capital side.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced a rare period of consecutive net outflows at that time. Although different data sources vary slightly, multiple media outlets reported that as of early June, the outflow cycle had extended to about 13 trading days, with cumulative net outflows of approximately $4.4 billion, and the asset scale of related ETFs had also significantly retreated from previous highs. Ethereum-related products also saw consecutive outflows, indicating that capital was not just pulling out of a single product but reducing overall exposure to crypto assets.

The second trigger was Mt.Gox.

According to Coindesk, at 04:47 UTC on June 2, the Mt.Gox bankruptcy estate transferred 10,422.65 Bitcoin, worth about $739 million. Blockchain data platform Arkham Intelligence flagged the transfer, with approximately 10,306 BTC entering a previously unseen wallet address and another 116 BTC entering a known Mt.Gox hot wallet. This is the largest transfer from this estate in about six and a half months.

These coins did not go directly to an exchange, so they cannot be equated with a sale. A safer interpretation is that wallet consolidation or distribution preparations are underway. But traders usually don't wait for actual selling to occur before adjusting positions. Mt.Gox still holds about 34,504 BTC, worth about $2.43 billion, with the distribution deadline extended to October 31, 2026. Any large transfer will amplify potential selling pressure concerns well in advance.

When ETF redemptions coincide with Mt.Gox transfers, the buying support for Bitcoin on the spot side weakens, and the market's sensitivity to future supply increases sharply.

AI Funding Frenzy Intensifies Capital Diversion Pressure

This decline also occurred against another backdrop: AI and large tech companies are sucking up large amounts of venture capital.

Alphabet filed with the SEC on June 1, planning a $80 billion-level equity financing, including $30 billion in underwritten offerings, $40 billion in ATM offerings, and a $10 billion private placement to Berkshire Hathaway. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley were involved in underwriting. Berkshire's existing Alphabet stake was worth about $20 billion, and after the transaction it would rise to about $30 billion.

SpaceX also moved forward with a large IPO in June. According to Axios, SpaceX priced on June 11, raising $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.77 trillion. AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic have long been in the spotlight for large-scale fundraising and IPO expectations.

These capital flows cannot be simply written as the direct cause of Bitcoin's decline, but they constitute competition within risk assets. Some institutions estimate that large tech companies' AI capital expenditures could reach several hundred billion dollars in 2026. In this environment, incremental capital flows preferentially to AI, semiconductors, and large-cap tech stocks, meaning crypto assets like Bitcoin proxy assets, ETH, and SOL face higher capital diversion pressure.

This also explains the divergence in the market at the time: traditional risk assets and the AI chain still had buying interest, while crypto assets were sold to reduce exposure. The market was not in a full risk-off mode, but rather reordering different risk assets.

Leveraged Longs Amplify Decline into a Stampede

If it were only capital outflows and selling pressure expectations, Bitcoin might have only declined steadily. The roughly 10% drop in early June over two days was key because leveraged positions were triggered en masse.

According to Coindesk citing CoinGlass data for the same period, the total crypto market liquidation across all exchanges was about $1.84 billion in 24 hours, with long liquidations accounting for about $1.66 billion and short liquidations about $180 million. Approximately 277,000 traders were liquidated in a single day. Bitcoin long liquidations alone approached $900 million, combined with the previous day's liquidation, forming the largest deleveraging since February.

The mechanism is not complicated. Spot prices are first pushed lower by capital-side pressure, and the decline triggers insufficient margin for high-leverage long positions in perpetual contract markets. Exchanges automatically close positions, and the closures create new selling pressure. As prices continue to fall, the next layer of long positions is forced to liquidate, and the stampede widens.

This is also why selling 32 BTC cannot explain the crash, but when ETF redemptions, Mt.Gox transfers, and leveraged liquidations are combined, they can amplify a decline into a short-term sharp drop. Spot pressure provides direction, derivatives positions provide speed.

Technical Signals Begin to Approaching Late-Stage Decline, But Selling Pressure May Not Be Over

This sharp decline in early June does not necessarily mean Bitcoin has entered a new deep bear market, nor does it mean a bottom is imminent.

In terms of price levels, Bitcoin briefly approached the March K-line closing low near $65,771. If the price subsequently breaks below this area, but the weekly RSI does not simultaneously break below its March low, the market could form a bullish divergence where prices make new lows but momentum does not. A similar structure appeared near the bottom after the FTX crisis in 2022.

From a cyclical perspective, there is a reference. Previous major cycle lows roughly occurred within a range of 700 to 900 days after the halving. Currently, it is about 770 days since the April 2024 halving, entering a time window historically prone to late-stage decline signals.

However, these only indicate that the decline has entered a more sensitive area and cannot directly point to a reversal. Cycle lows tend to be a process, not a single K-line. Even if prices find support around $65,000, it could be accompanied by consolidation, repeated retesting, and position rotation.

The most noteworthy aspect of this crash is not that Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin, but that the crypto market triggered a concentrated deleveraging due to the combined effects of capital diversion, ETF redemptions, potential selling pressure, and high-leverage positions. As long as capital continues to flow preferentially to AI and large-cap tech assets, even if the crypto market experiences a technical rebound, it will take longer to prove that the selling pressure has been absorbed.

Click to learn about the positions BlockBeats is hiring for

Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:

Telegram subscription group: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram discussion group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Twitter official account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia