AI Bull Market Faces a "Stress Test": Can QQQ Continue to Hit New Highs?

Markets
Updated: 07/08/2026 02:33

In the early hours of July 8, 2026 (UTC+8), all three major U.S. stock indices closed lower. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.25% to 52,925.15 points; the S&P 500 dropped 0.45% to 7,503.85 points; and the Nasdaq Composite declined 1.16% to 25,818.69 points. The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), which tracks the Nasdaq 100 Index, also came under pressure, with the Nasdaq 100 falling 1.8% to 29,173.02 points that day.

This isn’t just an isolated technical correction. Over the past few weeks, the AI sector has experienced ongoing volatility, and skepticism is mounting about whether the artificial intelligence industry can deliver enough profits to justify its massive capital expenditures. The NDX Volatility Index has risen to around 27, reaching its highest level relative to the S&P 500 Volatility Index ( ) since 2002. The correlation among Nasdaq 100 constituents has climbed significantly above that of the S&P 500 in the past month, indicating that AI trades have become increasingly crowded.

Is the AI bull market coming to an end? As the core tracking vehicle for the Nasdaq 100, QQQ’s future trajectory is crucial not only for U.S. equity investors but also for the global pricing logic of risk assets—including the crypto market. Let’s break down the conditions and obstacles for QQQ to reach new highs from four perspectives: index composition, valuation, capital flows, and the macro environment.

QQQ’s AI Exposure: Weighting Structure and Narrative Dependence

The Nasdaq 100 Index, tracked by QQQ, comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies by market cap listed on the Nasdaq Composite. More than 60% of the index weight is allocated to technology stocks, giving it substantial exposure to the AI sector. As of July 2026, four of QQQ’s top five holdings—Nvidia, Micron, Microsoft, and Amazon—are deeply involved in or highly exposed to the AI spending boom.

The Nasdaq 100’s quarterly rebalancing in June 2026 further reinforced this trend. AI hardware and compute power companies such as CoreWeave, Astera Labs, Nebius, Rocket Lab, and Teradyne were added to the index, while some software firms were removed. Currently, semiconductors and AI hardware account for nearly 25% of the index weight. Meanwhile, the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants still represent about 37% of the Nasdaq 100.

This means QQQ’s performance is heavily dependent on the overall health of the AI value chain. In the first half of 2026, the Nasdaq 100 climbed roughly 20%, with ten stocks—almost all AI-related chipmakers and hardware firms—contributing the lion’s share of gains. This concentration is both the reason QQQ has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 18 months and its biggest vulnerability: if the AI narrative falters, QQQ lacks sufficient sector diversification to cushion downside risk.

Valuation Debate: The Logic Behind a 36.5x P/E Ratio

As of early July, QQQ’s weighted average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio stands at about 36.5x. This is far above the S&P 500’s long-term average and higher than QQQ’s own historical median. High valuations alone aren’t a bearish signal—in a low-rate, high-growth environment, growth assets deserve a premium. But the market environment is changing.

Goldman Sachs derivatives experts point out that investors are underweighting U.S. tech stocks, especially the "Magnificent Seven." Options market pricing shows that the cost of downside hedges for QQQ has risen significantly above that of comparable small-cap stocks. This means market participants are paying a higher insurance premium to guard against QQQ declines—a defensive, not aggressive, posture.

At the heart of the valuation debate is a fundamental question: Can AI investments generate enough profits to support current stock prices? If the massive capital expenditures on AI infrastructure fail to translate into sustainable earnings growth, QQQ’s high-valuation, AI-driven constituents will face re-rating pressure. The answer remains uncertain. For example, Samsung Electronics posted strong Q2 profits but fell short of buy-side expectations, triggering a sharp stock drop and dragging down the global semiconductor sector. This reflects a broader reality: expectations for AI-related companies are now so high that it’s "almost impossible to deliver upside surprises."

Capital Rotation: Crowding and Divergence in AI Trades

Trading on July 8 clearly demonstrated capital rotation within the AI sector. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 4.65% that day, with Intel down over 9%, Western Digital and SanDisk both down more than 7%, and Micron Technology off more than 4%. By contrast, Nvidia bucked the trend, closing up 0.71% at $196.93.

The divergence is even more pronounced in the options market. Nvidia’s call options volume exceeded 1.5 million contracts, while put options were under 690,000, meaning call buying more than doubled put buying. There was also a notable large trade—a single investor reportedly spent about $3.5 million to buy call options expiring at the end of July with a $200 strike price. In contrast, the options structure for the semiconductor ETF (SMH) was the opposite: put buying was nearly four times call buying.

This divergence shows that the market isn’t systematically exiting the AI sector, but is instead becoming more selective—capital is rotating out of storage chipmakers and other overheated subsectors and into core AI chip names like Nvidia. Goldman Sachs describes this as a shift in AI trading from a "beta bull market" to "alpha differentiation." For QQQ, this means the broad-based rally logic may no longer hold, and future performance will depend more on the relative strength among its constituents.

Macro Variables: Rates, Geopolitics, and Volatility

Beyond the AI sector’s own fundamentals, QQQ’s performance is constrained by several macro variables.

Interest Rate Path: AI is a positive driver for equities on the earnings side, as it boosts revenue, orders, and profit expectations. However, it doesn’t necessarily favor a rapid rate-cutting cycle—AI makes the economy more resilient to high rates, giving the Fed less urgency to ease. If the Fed keeps rates elevated for longer due to economic strength, QQQ’s high-growth exposure will face more valuation pressure than the broader market.

Geopolitics: On July 7, U.S. Central Command launched a series of strikes against Iran in response to Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in international waters. The U.S. Treasury simultaneously revoked a general license allowing Iranian oil sales. Geopolitical tensions pushed oil prices higher, with NYMEX August light crude futures rising 2.76% to $70.44 per barrel. Rising oil prices stoke inflation concerns, further constraining valuation room for growth stocks.

Volatility Structure: The Nasdaq 100’s 30-day realized volatility has climbed to 29.7. SpaceX was officially added to the Nasdaq 100 on July 7, plunging 6.83% on its debut. As a high-volatility IPO, SpaceX’s inclusion is expected to further widen the volatility gap between the Nasdaq and the S&P 500. A high-volatility environment is unfavorable for QQQ’s trend growth, as institutional investors tend to reduce positions or increase hedges when volatility spikes.

Conclusion: Conditions and Pathways to New Highs

Returning to the core question: Can the AI bull market drive QQQ to new all-time highs?

On the support side, QQQ needs to meet several prerequisites for new highs. First, AI capital expenditures must continue to translate into corporate profits, with growth outpacing already lofty market expectations. Second, capital rotation must shift from "embracing all things AI" to "selecting core AI assets," but QQQ’s index structure is inherently less suited to such targeted allocation. Third, the macro environment must remain relatively stable, with no simultaneous shocks from geopolitics or rising rates.

On the resistance side, QQQ currently faces four major headwinds: elevated valuations, crowded trades, rising volatility, and escalating geopolitical risks. Since late March, the Nasdaq 100 has surged about 30%, leading to significant short-term profit-taking. Goldman Sachs warns that if the AI sector driving this rally reverses, the large pool of unrealized gains could quickly turn into selling pressure, with potential drawdowns of up to 50%. While this is an extreme scenario, it highlights the fragility of current positioning.

The market action on July 8 offers a snapshot answer: the AI bull market isn’t over, but it has entered a "stress test" phase. Nvidia’s resilience and bullish options activity show that core AI assets still have capital support; but the sharp selloff in storage chips and the Nasdaq’s 1.8% drop also signal that the market is scrutinizing the AI narrative more critically.

For long-term QQQ investors, history shows that buying QQQ at Nasdaq highs has rarely been a truly poor long-term entry point. However, the short-term path will inevitably be bumpy. The story of the AI bull market driving QQQ to new highs isn’t over, but the next stage of momentum will shift from "valuation expansion" to "earnings validation"—and that validation process is only just beginning.

FAQ

Q1: What is QQQ, and how is it related to the AI bull market?

QQQ is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) issued by Invesco that tracks the Nasdaq 100 Index. Technology stocks make up over 60% of the index, and core AI companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon are among QQQ’s top holdings. As a result, QQQ’s performance is highly dependent on the health of the AI sector and market confidence in the AI narrative.

Q2: What is the current valuation level of QQQ?

As of early July 2026, QQQ’s weighted average P/E ratio is about 36.5x. This is above its historical average and higher than the S&P 500. While high valuations aren’t inherently bearish, the risk of multiple contraction is worth watching given persistently high interest rates and the fact that AI profits have yet to fully materialize.

Q3: How does capital rotation within the AI sector affect QQQ?

Currently, capital is rotating out of overheated subsectors like storage chips and into core AI chip names such as Nvidia. This divergence means QQQ’s index structure may struggle to capture alpha returns—performance will depend more on the relative strength among its constituents, unless core AI assets continue to outperform expectations.

Q4: What are the key conditions for QQQ to reach new highs in the future?

QQQ needs to meet three main conditions to reach new highs: continued conversion of AI capital expenditures into above-expectation profits; enough support for the index as capital rotation shifts from "embracing all AI" to "selecting core assets"; and a relatively stable macro environment, with rates and geopolitics not causing systemic shocks.

The content herein does not constitute any offer, solicitation, or recommendation. You should always seek independent professional advice before making any investment decisions. Please note that Gate may restrict or prohibit the use of all or a portion of the Services from Restricted Locations. For more information, please read the User Agreement

Share

sign up guide logosign up guide logo
sign up guide content imgsign up guide content img
Sign Up
Log In