US CPI cools as oil prices surge: How could the US-Iran conflict change the Fed’s interest rate path?

XTIUSD-0.29%
XBRUSD-0.29%
On July 14, the U.S. Bureau of Labor published June 2026 CPI data.

June’s CPI year over year, not seasonally adjusted, rose 3.5%, below the market expectation of 3.8% and significantly down from the prior value of 4.2%. Core CPI rose 2.6% year over year, also below the expectation of 2.8% and the prior value of 2.9%. Seasonally adjusted CPI fell 0.4% month over month, the largest one-month drop since April 2020, and the first time in six years that CPI has shown negative month-over-month growth.



This inflation report was supposed to be a catalyst for a looser-market trade. After the data release, U.S. Treasury yields and the U.S. Dollar Index both fell, gold rebounded, and U.S. stock index futures rose. However, this “late” inflation tailwind lasted less than 48 hours—an abrupt escalation of the U.S.-Iran military conflict is rapidly rewriting the inflation outlook and the Fed’s policy path at a pace well beyond market expectations.

June CPI: A technical cooldown dominated by energy prices



The stronger-than-expected drop in June CPI is essentially a technical cooldown driven by energy prices. June energy prices fell 5.7% month over month, versus a prior increase of 3.9%. Energy alone dragged down CPI month over month by 0.43 percentage points, which basically explains the entire month-over-month decline in June CPI. Specifically, energy commodities fell 9.5% month over month, and U.S. gasoline prices fell for four straight weeks throughout June. Core goods prices fell 0.1% month over month and have declined for two consecutive months; the month-over-month growth rate of core services fell from the prior value of 0.3% to 0%.

In other words, the broad-based cooldown in June inflation data relies heavily on a temporary window in which international oil prices fell from May to June. And that window is being quickly closed by geopolitics.



June CPI cooldown vs oil price rebound—an offset in inflation pressure

Markets briefly price in easier expectations, but the pricing logic has started to drift



After the June CPI release, the market temporarily repriced the Fed’s policy path. CME FedWatch shows that following the data release, expectations for the Fed to raise rates at some point within 2026 pulled back slightly. However, this “easing trade” window was extremely short-lived.

Even before the CPI data was released, renewed escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict had already been nudging rate-hike expectations higher. According to the CME FedWatch tool, as of July 13, the probability of a 25 bps rate hike at the July 29 meeting had risen to 46.5%, up sharply from 34% the day before. Traders on the prediction market platform Kalshi also expected a 36% probability of a rate hike in July, higher than less than 20% on Sunday and far above the less-than-10% level earlier this month. By July 14, CME data showed a 58.3% probability that rates would be kept unchanged in July—hikes and holding steady were nearing a “50-50” split.

Rate-hike expectations briefly fell after the inflation data, but geopolitical risk quickly resumed driving market pricing. This trend clearly shows that the market’s core issue is no longer “whether inflation is cooling,” but rather “how much oil prices will rise and for how long.”

How the U.S.-Iran conflict rewrites the oil price path



The cooldown in June CPI was precisely built on a background of temporary easing in U.S.-Iran relations. In June, because the U.S.-Iran situation was temporarily easing, oil prices pulled down the broader U.S. CPI. But this easing is extremely fragile.

On July 7, U.S. forces launched frequent attacks on Iran, citing “Iranian threats to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.” On July 10, President Trump formally notified Congress that the Iran conflict had reignited. On July 12, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. On July 13, Trump announced the resumption of the maritime blockade against Iran. U.S. forces restored the maritime blockade targeting vessels traveling to and from Iranian ports and coastal areas at 2:30 a.m. local Iranian time on July 15. Meanwhile, Iranian forces carried out airstrikes on U.S. military bases in multiple regional countries including Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain.

The Strait of Hormuz rapidly fell into a “dual blockade” situation. Shipping data shows that the number of vessels passing through the strait declined from dozens per day at the beginning of this month to single digits; on July 13, only 6 ships passed, down sharply from the level of more than 100 ships per day on average before the conflict. Data from the International Energy Agency shows that in the Gulf region, current average daily oil supply is only 16 million barrels, down significantly from 24 million barrels before the Middle East conflict.

Oil prices then surged. On July 13, international oil prices closed up more than 9%, marking the largest single-day gain since May 2020. Brent crude futures closed up 9.59%, with a settlement price of $83.30 per barrel; WTI crude futures closed up 9.42%, with a settlement price of $78.14 per barrel. On July 14, international oil prices continued to rise: WTI crude futures broke above $81 per barrel, and Brent crude futures rose above $87 per barrel.

According to Gate market data, as of July 16, WTI crude was $78.89 per barrel, down 0.97% over 24 hours, with an intraday range of $77.78 to $80.07. Brent crude was $83.25 per barrel, down 1.23% over 24 hours, with an intraday range of $82.28 to $84.54. Natural gas was $2.875, up 0.14% over 24 hours. After several days of sharp gains, oil prices saw a brief technical pullback on July 16, but overall remained in a high-level, choppy range.

$XTIUSD$XBRUSD

Analysts noted that if export recovery in the Gulf region continues to stall, Brent crude could break $110 in the fourth quarter. Even if the situation does not worsen further, the oil price mid-cycle level is unlikely to return to pre-conflict levels.

How oil price gains transmit to CPI and PCE

To understand the impact of rising oil prices on Fed policy, it’s necessary to clarify the transmission mechanism from energy prices to broader inflation indicators.

First layer of transmission: Direct pull from energy CPI. With June CPI down 0.4% month over month, the energy component contributed 0.43 percentage points of downside. This means that if energy prices return to the levels before June, the energy component alone could pull CPI month over month from negative growth back into positive growth. Current WTI prices are up more than $15 per barrel from June’s trough. Based on the elasticity relationship between June energy prices and oil, the contribution from the energy component could quickly flip from -0.43 percentage points to a positive contribution.

Second layer of transmission: Indirect spillover to core inflation. Oil prices not only directly affect energy CPI, but also transmit to downstream goods and services prices through channels such as transportation costs and relative-price effects. In May, the relative-price ratio between U.S. core CPI and energy CPI had already fallen to levels not seen in recent years, indicating that core inflation is facing clear pressure from oil prices. While the June oil price decline helps ease downstream price pressure, that relief is being reversed. Ajay Rajadhyaksha, Chairman of Barclays Global Research, said the price transmission effects from an oil price shock have not ended, and high energy prices have not suppressed demand—only worsened inflation further.

Third layer of transmission: Sticky PCE response. The Fed’s main inflation metric is the PCE price index, not CPI. May PCE rose 4.1% year over year, higher than April’s 3.8%; core PCE rose 3.4% year over year, the highest since October 2023. Core PCE is at 3.4%, far above the Fed’s 2% long-term target. Institutional estimates put the year-end overall PCE year-over-year increase at 3.6%, and core PCE year over year at 3.3%. And this is a forecast made before oil prices have rebounded significantly. If oil prices hold in or further rise within the $85 to $90 per barrel range, the year-end PCE reading would likely need upward revision. Fed officials have predicted that inflation will stay elevated throughout 2026 and only ease in 2027.

Transmission chain from rising oil prices to inflation and Fed policy

Fed policy dilemma: Misalignment between data dependence and geopolitical shocks

In testimony submitted to the House of Representatives on the day CPI data was released, Fed Chair Waller reiterated an anti-inflation stance and emphasized avoiding inflation expectations from rising. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said the central bank should not repeat the mistakes of 2021 and 2022—acting too slowly while inflation was rising. But he added that the central bank should not over-correct by hiking rates too fast.

This statement accurately summarizes the Fed’s current policy dilemma.

Rate-hike scenario: If oil prices remain above $85 per barrel, the cooling seen in June CPI would prove to be temporary. Given that core PCE is already at 3.4%, a second wave from energy prices could push overall inflation back above 4%. In this scenario, a Fed rate hike in July is not impossible—CME FedWatch shows a 46.5% probability of a hike, indicating the market is pricing in that possibility seriously.

Hold-steady scenario: In the baseline scenario, overall and core inflation in the U.S. continues to trend gradually lower. Shenwan Hongyuan believes that, considering the outlook for overall and core inflation cooling, the Fed could maintain “patience” without raising rates, and the hold-steady strategy may be sustainable through the first half of 2027. Donghai Research also said that with the U.S. labor market balanced by a simultaneous decline in supply and demand, under the baseline scenario, the likelihood of the Fed holding steady within the year remains relatively high. Morgan Asset Management also expects the Fed to keep rates unchanged in 2026 and make a single rate cut in the second half of 2027.

A third path: “Managing rate-hike expectations” between hikes and holding steady. Some analysts argue that the next 2 to 3 months could be a window of higher risk for Fed rate hikes—if oil prices rebound quickly and inflation pressure continues to transmit to downstream prices, the Fed may choose to raise rates. But given that the Fed did not choose to hike during a period when oil price pressure was greater earlier, the probability of actual rate hikes within the year remains low. A more likely Fed strategy would be to keep rates unchanged, while guiding market expectations through hawkish messaging to preserve flexibility for later policy decisions.

A dual pricing logic for U.S. Treasury yields

U.S. Treasury yields are simultaneously pricing in two forces: the easing expectations driven by the June CPI cooldown, and the renewed inflation risk driven by oil price increases. The brief drop in Treasury yields after the data release was quickly overtaken by a geopolitical risk premium.

In the short term, if oil prices continue to rise, the Treasury yield curve could become more “bear steep,” with longer-end yields rising due to higher inflation expectations, while shorter-end yields remain elevated as rate-hike expectations heat up. In the medium to long term, if the Fed chooses to hold steady and inflation stays elevated due to energy prices, real interest rates could decline passively. That would support interest-free assets such as gold, but it would mean continued erosion of purchasing power for holders of Treasuries.

Goldman Sachs’ scenario analysis provides two extreme reference points: if export recovery in the Gulf region continues to stall, Brent could break $110 in the fourth quarter; if tensions ease and production recovers faster than expected, oil prices could fall to the $60 range by year-end. These scenarios map to sharply different Fed policy paths—the first points to rate hikes and even further tightening, while the second opens room for rate cuts in 2027.

What the market is pricing right now is a middle state between these extremes: oil prices oscillating at high levels, the slope of inflation cooling flattening as it narrows, and the Fed staying patient while keeping the option of rate hikes. The June CPI data proves one thing: when energy prices fall, inflation can cool quickly. But the escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict also proves another thing: when energy supply is threatened, this cooling can be reversed even faster.

For the Fed, the June CPI is a reassuring report, but geopolitical risks are rapidly turning that reassurance into fresh anxiety. The rate decision on July 29 will be the first observation window for how this anxiety translates into policy action.

FAQ

Q1: Why did the June U.S. CPI data come in far below market expectations?

Primarily driven by a decline in energy prices. In June, energy prices fell 5.7% month over month; this alone dragged down CPI month over month by 0.43 percentage points, basically explaining the entire month-over-month drop in CPI for the month. Core goods prices fell for two straight months, and the month-over-month growth rate of core services also fell from 0.3% to 0%.

Q2: How big is the impact of the Strait of Hormuz blockade on global crude oil supply?

The Strait of Hormuz accounts for about 20% of global seaborne oil shipment volume. Current average daily oil supply in the Gulf region has fallen from 24 million barrels before the conflict to 16 million barrels. On July 13, only 6 ships passed through the strait, down sharply from the pre-conflict average of over 100 ships per day.

Q3: How does a rise in oil prices affect the PCE inflation gauge the Fed cares about most?

Oil prices transmit to PCE through three channels: directly affecting the energy PCE component; indirectly pushing up core goods prices via transportation costs and relative-price effects; and squeezing corporate profits as energy costs rise, which then transmits to service prices. In May, core PCE had already risen to 3.4%, and an oil price rebound would make it harder for PCE to fall.

Q4: What is the current probability of the Fed raising rates in July?

As of July 16, the CME FedWatch tool shows a 10.2% probability of a 25 bps rate hike by the Fed at its July meeting, and an 89.8% probability of keeping rates unchanged.

Q5: If oil prices remain elevated, could the Fed still cut rates in 2026?

Most institutions believe the likelihood of rate cuts in 2026 is low. Morgan Asset Management expects the Fed to keep rates unchanged in 2026 and make one rate cut in the second half of 2027. Shenwan Hongyuan believes the hold-steady strategy could be sustainable through the first half of 2027. If oil prices continue to stay elevated, the time window for rate cuts would be pushed further back.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
CryptoSatvip
· 2h ago
ETF Flows Update (15 July 2026) • $BTC : +$107.80 Million • $ETH : +$53.83 Million • $XRP : $0 • $SOL : -$707.08 Thousand • $HYPE : +$2.13 Million Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs extended inflows on July 15, while HyperLiquid ETF also recorded a small inflow. Solana ETF saw a minor outflow, and XRP ETF remained flat.
Reply0
TheForestIsNotGreenvip
· 2h ago
The bull run is fast, and it will return quickly to 🐂.
View OriginalReply0