#比特币与黄金战争 The independence of the Federal Reserve is being redefined
Recently, a phenomenon worth noting has emerged: when power players start setting expectations for a "must cut interest rates" for the central bank chair, monetary policy is no longer just an economic issue but becomes a political game. What does this mean for the global asset pricing system?
Three changes are taking place—
**Rules are loosening.** Traditionally, central bank decisions are based on economic data and long-term stability. Now, that assumption may no longer hold. If interest rate decisions follow short-term political cycles rather than economic fundamentals, market prediction models lose reliable input variables.
**Forecasting becomes difficult.** Analytical frameworks based on historical data suddenly fail. How will assets like $BTC, $DOGE, $FIL, $BNB respond to an uncertain policy environment? A single political tweet can trigger thousands of points in market fluctuations—this is the real picture of the 2025 "news-driven" market.
**But this also raises an essential question—**
When the rules of the fiat system become malleable, which assets truly preserve value?
The traditional answer is gold. But Bitcoin offers another option: its scarcity is derived from mathematics, not promises; its supply is determined by code, not power. Regardless of who the central bank chair is or how policies sway, the cap of 21 million coins remains unchanged.
So, the question boils down to the object of trust: is it trust in the power struggles within political cycles, or in the strength of code and global consensus?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasDevourer
· 2025-12-28 02:00
Now the central bank has truly become a plaything of power, rules can be changed at will, how are we supposed to play?
Bitcoin, on the other hand, appears even more pure, no need to look at anyone's face.
Market driven by news, just hearing it is annoying, feels like we're about to be cut at any moment.
Code is much more reliable than promises, that's the truth.
Wait, is gold also about to be hijacked by politics? Can't escape it.
21 million coins will never change, that's what I want.
The loosening of rules is actually an opportunity, see who can read this game.
All the nice words are just financial games, and the harsh words are power grabs.
Still trusting mathematics, human nature is unreliable.
This article hit a nerve with me, the independence of the central bank is actually a false proposition.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 2025-12-27 18:33
I just said, once Rule 1 changes the interest rate, everything gets chaotic. How can we still expect to predict the market?
---
Hardcoded code, soft power tricks. Which one to choose, do I even need to say?
---
A single political tweet causing thousands of points of fluctuation? That's ridiculous. It feels like the entire market is betting on politicians' moods.
---
The independence of the Federal Reserve was doomed to be broken long ago. Now everyone is relying solely on Bitcoin's 21 million supply.
---
Gold: What's wrong with me? Bitcoin: I'm just math. Haha.
---
Market movements driven by news are just an upgraded form of gambling. No fundamentals, only Twitter jokes.
---
Trust in code or trust in power? That's not even the real issue. Neither should be trusted at all.
---
I laugh at the idea that fiat currency rules are malleable. How can we make long-term plans then?
---
By 2025, this is how it will be. It feels like the market has already entered an anarchic state.
---
Bitcoin is the most honest, never issuing more. Central bank rhetoric should have been phased out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKaren
· 2025-12-25 02:49
No, the loosening of rules has been happening for a while; it's just now being brought to the table for discussion. Code > power, this is non-negotiable.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 2025-12-25 02:35
Basically, it's political interference in the economy. What's the point of the central bank being independent... Instead of betting on the Federal Reserve, it's better to bet on mathematics.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 2025-12-25 02:26
Actually, instead of worrying about what the Federal Reserve is thinking, better ask yourself if you trust the code...
---
2025 will be a political Twitter-led governance era, let's dance to the news
---
Basically, it's still the same question: do you bet on power or on mathematics?
---
Loosening the rules is the right move; only then can BTC's logic stand firm
---
That gold set is long outdated, wake up everyone
---
Central bank governors being kidnapped by politicians? It just proves we need Bitcoin
---
I'm really tired of news-driven markets, but this is 2025, brother
---
The failure of prediction models actually signals the arrival of the BTC era
---
Trust the code, not promises—that's the core logic of Web3
---
When monetary policy turns into a political game, I become even more optimistic about decentralized assets
#比特币与黄金战争 The independence of the Federal Reserve is being redefined
Recently, a phenomenon worth noting has emerged: when power players start setting expectations for a "must cut interest rates" for the central bank chair, monetary policy is no longer just an economic issue but becomes a political game. What does this mean for the global asset pricing system?
Three changes are taking place—
**Rules are loosening.** Traditionally, central bank decisions are based on economic data and long-term stability. Now, that assumption may no longer hold. If interest rate decisions follow short-term political cycles rather than economic fundamentals, market prediction models lose reliable input variables.
**Forecasting becomes difficult.** Analytical frameworks based on historical data suddenly fail. How will assets like $BTC, $DOGE, $FIL, $BNB respond to an uncertain policy environment? A single political tweet can trigger thousands of points in market fluctuations—this is the real picture of the 2025 "news-driven" market.
**But this also raises an essential question—**
When the rules of the fiat system become malleable, which assets truly preserve value?
The traditional answer is gold. But Bitcoin offers another option: its scarcity is derived from mathematics, not promises; its supply is determined by code, not power. Regardless of who the central bank chair is or how policies sway, the cap of 21 million coins remains unchanged.
So, the question boils down to the object of trust: is it trust in the power struggles within political cycles, or in the strength of code and global consensus?