#SUPRA Hello, CZ, we met a few years ago in Taiwan. You might not remember me or @JonEvansJones, but I want to say that I believe your contributions to this industry have not been fully appreciated.

But I also think that Binance's listing process needs some improvement.

For example, I know you are a super science geek and supporter. However, even after communicating with everyone for several years, @SUPRA_Labs, you still haven't made the list -- we truly are one of the best and most pioneering Web3 computer science teams in the world!

The evidence is that we have been accepted by many top global computer science conferences, such as the world-renowned ACM CCS 2025 (we have been accepted multiple times).

We have the fastest EVM parallel execution algorithm in the world, the highest performance DAG design in the world, and our Hydrangea consensus algorithm is also the fastest among similar algorithms in the world.

We are the third to launch Move Lang L1 in history, but the Binance team has listed another technically inferior Move L2 (which is now apparently L1) instead of us. Frankly, they only have the ability to fork technology... not to create it... and it seems that their founder has left the project.

You can imagine how confused I am about the due diligence process, why that project can be listed while we cannot.

Do you have any pointers or suggestions?

We have invested most of our resources to promote the development of computer science and will continue to do so.

If the listing process is about value, I assure you that we have all the fundamental conditions. If the listing process is about hype, then our DNA focuses more on proving our ideas rather than excessively exaggerating for hype... but we will also strive in this regard.

Although my personal views on CEX and DEX are clearly the same as yours, our community unsurprisingly hopes for a Binance listing.

We are willing to continue to invest our full efforts to promote Web3 innovation and push the entire industry to break limits. Competition is a good thing!

As a science enthusiast and supporter, I hope that the people around you can see this message...

As a founder... I resonate deeply with some of the recent comments about the listing process... But some of us simply cannot afford this price, especially for L1 projects like ours that need block rewards to achieve long-term sustainable development. By the way, this price is not just the founder's own...

For my community, the fact remains that projects like ours need more liquidity and exposure, and Binance, whether we like it or not, is still number one in the world... I know this too.

Dear @cz_binance, I know you are not responsible for matters like listing coins, but it would be great if the results of core innovation (such as achieving world-class standards in multiple protocol designs) could play a greater role in the decision-making process. To realize our existing innovations... this requires a lot of focus, energy, and creativity (that is, resources). We hope to dedicate all our resources to these goals.

As a founder, you know that projects need to retain as many limited resources as possible to continue giving back to Web3 and explore the possibilities of decentralized networks.

In short, we really cannot afford the amount of tokens being requested from us. We would like to see how we can move forward through our merits and contributions.

We are one of the most sincere and dedicated projects in this field. Our achievements are remarkable compared to competitors with 4 to 8 times more funding than us.

Wishing you a wonderful day!
Push it, brothers!