💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinTRUST 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to TRUST or the CandyDrop campaign for a chance to share 13,333 TRUST in rewards!
📅 Event Period: Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 16, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 Related Campaign:
CandyDrop 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47990
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content related to TRUST or the CandyDrop event.
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinTRUST
4️⃣ Include a screenshot showing your CandyDrop participation.
🏆 Rewards (Total: 13,333 TRUST)
🥇 1st Prize (1 winner): 3,833
The Supreme Court's chambers echoed with sharp exchanges today as justices from both ends of the ideological spectrum grilled the current administration over its ambitious tariff agenda. What's at stake? Potentially one of the most far-reaching trade policy shifts in decades—tariffs that could blanket nearly every imported product entering American borders.
Both conservative and liberal justices didn't hold back, pressing hard on the legal foundations and economic implications of such sweeping duties. The questions cut deep: Does the executive branch have unchecked authority to reshape international trade policy? What happens to businesses, consumers, and trading partners when tariffs become this comprehensive?
This isn't just a courtroom drama. The outcome could ripple through supply chains worldwide, affecting everything from electronics manufacturing to commodity imports. For anyone tracking global markets—crypto miners worried about hardware costs, traders watching inflation signals, or businesses navigating international payment rails—this case matters.
The justices seemed skeptical, and that skepticism matters. If the court limits executive tariff powers, we might see a fundamental shift in how trade policy gets made. If they green-light the approach? Buckle up for a new era of protectionism that could reshape economic relationships across continents.
Right now, it's all questions and no answers. But the legal battle unfolding could define trade policy for years to come.