🚀 Gate Square “Gate Fun Token Challenge” is Live!
Create tokens, engage, and earn — including trading fee rebates, graduation bonuses, and a $1,000 prize pool!
Join Now 👉 https://www.gate.com/campaigns/3145
💡 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Create Tokens: One-click token launch in [Square - Post]. Promote, grow your community, and earn rewards.
2️⃣ Engage: Post, like, comment, and share in token community to earn!
📦 Rewards Overview:
Creator Graduation Bonus: 50 GT
Trading Fee Rebate: The more trades, the more you earn
Token Creator Pool: Up to $50 USDT per user + $5 USDT for the first 50 launche
This thread, you are a pig, you can understand what's going on!
This line, you are just a streamer, and you can't really explain whether it can be broken or not!
So, you still can't explain whether it can be solved or not. Why are you using this line to answer this question for a group of pigs? Either you think the pigs can't draw this line themselves, and you're teaching them how to draw it; I really can't find a second reason.
In this world, for any problem, before it is solved, there will be someone who exhausts their lifelong learning to create a formula to answer it. However, you not only failed to solve the problem with this formula, but instead created two additional problems with it, and you still can't solve them?
I am quite stubborn, and I just can't understand what psychological drive led the first person to draw such support line technical indicators, who, in a fit of enthusiasm, determined that this is the support line/resistance line, collectively referred to as the trend line.
Alright, let's talk one by one. Support line, during a rising trend, buy when it retraces to the trend line; resistance line, during a falling trend, sell when it rebounds to the resistance line.
It is obvious that these two sentences serve two different purposes. The support line during the upward trend is used for going long. Why has it been used by modern people to indicate both long and short positions? If a single sentence can define two functions, then why didn't the person who created this technical indicator use one sentence to explain it when they defined it??
Maybe this guy isn't a dry streamer! There's really no reason that makes sense.
If I’m not mistaken, in a few days, whether the market goes up or down, the narrative will be that we initially said we wouldn’t break and were bullish, and sure enough, it went up, right? If it breaks, we short it, and it’s gone down, hasn’t it? I just want to ask if the big things are reliable or not. I don’t know if you will light some incense for the master on the first and fifteenth day of the New Year to ensure a worry-free life, but coming back, we still don’t know if life can be broken.