🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
If you don't have much money on hand but want to bet on the AI computing power track, which one should you choose between TAO and HBAR? Someone has provided a data comparison.
Bittensor (TAO) appears to be more attractive—with a market capitalization of $2 billion and generating about $78,000 in real income daily. In other words, its valuation is much more compact compared to HBAR in relation to actual earnings. Most importantly, the decentralization level of TAO is far higher than that of its competitors, which is no small matter in the Web3 world.
Hedera (HBAR) relies on EVM compatibility to thrive, with a market value of $4.5 billion and a decent level of ecosystem acceptance. However, from a valuation perspective, its earnings-to-market-cap ratio appears less attractive.
In the long run, who can go further on the crypto AI track? It still depends on the degree of decentralization, yield efficiency, and the team's understanding of AI infrastructure. TAO seems to be more imaginative in these three dimensions. If small investors have to choose one, the data is here.