Aster's tournament just wrapped, and the results are pretty telling. The human trading team finished with a –32.21% ROI, while the AI team came in at –4.48%. On paper, both took losses—that's the reality of market conditions. But here's what caught attention: the AI strategy significantly outperformed despite the bear headwinds. The gap between –32.21% and –4.48% is substantial when you're managing positions in a volatile crypto market. It raises interesting questions about algorithmic execution, risk management, and how machines handle emotional discipline that human traders sometimes struggle with. Whether it's better signal processing, faster reaction times, or just colder logic under pressure, the numbers speak. Not exactly a bullish outcome for either side, but a solid reminder that in trading competitions, it's not always about winning—it's about losing less when conditions go against you.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasSavingMastervip
· 2h ago
Emma, AI won again... this time by 28 points. The gap is pretty huge.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 2h ago
Oh my, AI lost 4.48% while humans directly lost 32%... That's a pretty huge gap.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 2h ago
ngl ai really got called out this time, -4.48% versus -32.21%... this gap is huge, human traders are still too easily influenced by emotions.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 2h ago
A 28% gap, that's a pretty scary difference haha
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)