🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
In the stablecoin ecosystem, the differences in compliance enforcement are much greater than you might imagine.
According to blockchain data analysis, between 2023 and 2025, Tether and Circle have taken completely different approaches to asset freezing. Tether has been very aggressive—freezing a total of $33 billion in crypto assets, with over 7,200 blacklisted addresses, of which more than 2,800 are in cooperation with US law enforcement agencies. This scale alone is already quite shocking.
What’s even more interesting is Tether’s operational logic. They don’t simply freeze assets and stop there, but adopt a complete mechanism of "freeze + destroy + reissue" to recover funds involved in scams and illegal activities. Data shows that over half of the frozen USDT are on the Tron network.
Circle’s approach is much more cautious. They only act when there is a court ruling or clear regulatory requirement, freezing 372 addresses and involving $109 million between 2023 and 2025. When comparing both sides, the gap reaches about 30 times. Circle has not yet taken measures such as token destruction or reissuance.
From this comparison, it’s clear that the two stablecoin issuers have different understandings and implementations of compliance—one is proactive, the other is reactive.