2025-12-25 09:25:57

The evolution of prediction markets is underway. Many see it as a simple gambling game, but true innovation lies in how to transform uncertainty into financial infrastructure.

The key is not about betting right or wrong, but about aggregating fragmented information into tradable probability signals. When market sentiment, on-chain behavioral data, and macroeconomic events are priced uniformly, prediction markets are no longer just speculative tools—they become an engine capable of aggregating the collective cognition of the entire network. Dispersed voices find their benchmarks here, and uncertainty is quantified here. This is the new direction of Web3 finance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StableNomad

· 7h ago

actually... this is just UST with extra steps. aggregating "full network cognition" sounds great until correlation coefficient breaks down mid-market crash. been here before. back in the LUNA days we all thought we'd figured out pricing uncertainty too lol

Reply0

GasFeeLover

· 7h ago

Operating prediction markets is similar to gambling, but the core is indeed information pricing, which is good. The real value lies in aggregating cognition rather than making money, but most people are still in it to earn profits. This logic sounds clear, but how does it work in practice? Is there enough liquidity? Probability signals sound sophisticated, but who will solve the issues of market manipulation and information asymmetry? Web3 version of oracles? The prospects look good, but the key is whether real big funds will enter.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 7h ago

Good morning, I want to be honest at 3 a.m.—this concept of "aggregated cognition" sounds like it's putting a philosophical veneer on sandwich attacks. The real liquidity trap is hidden within these pretty narratives.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 7h ago

Probabilistic pricing is indeed interesting, but to be honest, most people are still stuck in a gambler's mindset. Information aggregation sounds impressive, but how many can truly consolidate fragmented data into signals? Having heard a lot about uncertainty quantification, the key factors are whether liquidity is sufficient, whether trading pairs are enough, and whether the ecosystem is active. I believe in this logic, but in reality, retail investors still treat the market as a slot machine. Infrastructure needs to be fully developed, but for now, it still feels like the prelude stage.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 7h ago

Damn, this logic—really treating uncertainty as a product to sell? Sounds sophisticated, but it's really just a gambler's happy channel. Wait, no, there is actually something to the information aggregation pricing... I just don't know how long it can last. Another new direction in Web3, I just want to ask, who the hell is using this to make predictions? I heard this kind of rhetoric from a crypto influencer last time, and it all feels like armchair theorizing. Damn, if only we could aggregate public wisdom into financial tools, the crypto market should have already rebounded, haha. By the way, what's the fundamental difference between this and traditional futures markets? It sounds great, but how will it be implemented? Isn't it just another name for retail investors to cut each other's throats?

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 7h ago

Another new concept to scam retail investors. To be honest, I also heard similar fusion arguments in 2018, and the result was a huge loss. Basically, it's still gambling with a different shell. Probabilistic signals sound fancy, but ultimately it's about who has more chips and wins. However, this time it is indeed a bit interesting. Aggregating cognition really addresses the pain point of information asymmetry among retail investors, making it more reliable than pure gambling. My usual advice remains: before getting on board, ask yourself if you can afford to lose.

View OriginalReply0