#数字资产动态追踪 From frequent liquidations to monthly stable profits, it took me two years to realize one truth—the secret to making money isn't about trading talent or prediction skills, but about surviving long enough. Those seemingly "dumbest" risk management methods are actually the underlying logic that allows accounts to grow continuously.



**First Line of Defense: Capital Must Stay Alive**

No matter how fancy a strategy is, a single liquidation can wipe it out. This is not alarmist; it’s a true reflection I’ve seen in too many people.

Position sizing is the most basic lesson. For an account with 100,000 capital, only allocate 10,000 per trade, keeping total position below 20%. What’s the benefit? Single mistakes won’t cause serious damage, and it gives you room to test and adjust.

Stop-loss must be mechanically executed, without emotion. Close the position immediately if loss reaches 2%, don’t negotiate or expect a rebound. It sounds harsh, but it’s this "timely stop" that preserves your firepower for the next trade.

Leverage—novices should avoid it altogether. If experienced traders must use it, keep position size below 10%. Most liquidation stories I’ve seen start with a "try leverage."

**Second Layer of Logic: Comparing Longs and Shorts, Longs Are More Profitable**

The market isn’t short of trading opportunities; what’s lacking is your ability to grasp high-quality ones. A common flaw is greed—wanting to trade more, faster, or to eat all profits at once. The result? Half of the fees are eaten up, and the rest gets repeatedly cut.

The correct approach is unidirectional—pick a direction (only long or only short), stick to one strategy, and don’t flip-flop. This significantly improves success rate because your mindset becomes more solid, and execution more pure.

Trading plans must be set in advance. Stop-loss at 3%, take-profit at 5%, and don’t change them during the session. This "mechanical discipline" sounds boring, but it often outperforms those who rely on on-the-spot "flexible" judgments.

Regarding trading frequency, an interesting phenomenon—your first 1-2 trades of the day are usually the highest quality, while more than 3 trades tend to just give away money in fees. Greed leads to fatigue, which causes decision errors, ultimately shrinking your account.

**Third Layer: Those Who Have Stepped Into These Pits Regret It**

Adding to positions against the trend is a suicidal move. Every time you add, you’re not "averaging down," but actively approaching the cliff of liquidation. The math is simple, but many people rationalize losses and just shut down when losing.

Meaningless trading is another invisible killer. Frequent opening and closing of positions can eat up a week’s profit in fees. True experts trade the least.

"Should still go up"—how many have gone broke because of this phrase? If profits aren’t taken in time, they’re just numbers on paper. Many liquidations stem from this kind of luck-based mentality—telling yourself "wait a bit longer" again and again.

**Data Speaks**

Suppose two people each have 100,000:

Wrong approach: full position trading + high leverage + adding positions mid-trade + holding through losses → results in liquidation during a certain drop.

Correct approach: only 20,000 in base position + 3% stop-loss discipline + 5% take-profit execution + only 2 carefully selected trades per week → monthly stable returns of around 8%, with compound annualized returns over 150%.

This isn’t just ideal data; it’s practically reproducible.

**Final Words**

The futures market is never a casino, though many come in with a gambler’s mindset. Using living expenses to gamble on the future usually ends badly.

The real logic of making money is simple: protect your principal → survive long enough → let compound interest work → qualify for big gains.

Use idle funds, stick to discipline, trade unidirectionally.

Reject all-in bets, reject holding through losses, reject two-way traps.

Stick to these six words, and your account will grow steadily.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BoredApeResistancevip
· 01-09 01:28
It's a good point, but how many people can really follow through... --- Living a long life hits too close to home. The ones I know who die quickly are all in on the gamble. --- Splitting a position into 20% sounds simple, but when there's a big surge, I just want to go all in. It's so hard to endure. --- A 2% stop loss really hurts, but every time I don't stick to it, I regret it to death. I've already paid this tuition. --- The phrase "the least trading" really hit me. My monthly income is actually inversely proportional to my trading frequency. --- Adding to a position against the trend is a suicidal move... I was wiped out doing that. Now I even get scared just thinking about it. --- Having half of your funds eaten up by fees— isn't that a problem? Frequent trading really is self-castration. --- "Wait a bit longer" has destroyed so many people— a bloody lesson. --- Is the 150% annualized return data serious, or is it just an ideal scenario? --- Saying "no to all-in" and "no to holding through" easily sounds, but actually executing them requires real discipline.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbievip
· 01-07 13:55
Damn, isn't this just my painful lesson? Two years ago, I was that fool who tried leverage just to "see what happens." Honestly, not cutting losses is like committing suicide in a casino. Now I only make 2-3 trades a month, with lower fees, and my account grows faster. To be honest, that 150% annualized return was a bit of an exaggeration, but a stable 8% monthly income is real, and it's a thousand times better than getting wiped out with full leverage. Living long enough—that's what really hit me. Contracts are just that brutal.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 01-06 09:29
There's nothing wrong with that, but how many people can truly stick with it?
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-06 09:23
ngl the "survive long enough" part hits different... spent way too much on failed txs learning this same lesson lol
Reply0
OnlyUpOnlyvip
· 01-06 09:08
It's the same old talk about "living long," sounding like a pep talk, but all the pitfalls have been experienced here. --- 2% stop-loss sounds simple, but when actually executed, it really feels like your heart is bleeding. --- Full position leverage, I've seen too many people go all-in and lose everything, a bloody lesson. --- I agree with the pace of two trades per week; frequent trading really just feeds the exchange. --- The phrase "living long" sounds simple, but it really depends on self-discipline; most people can't hold out. --- Adding to positions against the trend is brilliant; many people die at this stage, insisting on battling losses. --- A stable 8% monthly return sounds great, but you need discipline to achieve it; not everyone can do that. --- Taking profits without falling below the pocket really hits hard; watching the numbers retrace... it can drive you crazy. --- Setting the split position ratio at 20% is to stay alive and wait for the next opportunity. --- Leverage is poison for beginners; really, avoid it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)