2026-01-06 11:22:41

Listen to me, the wave of global regulatory actions at the beginning of the year truly shocked me—48 countries almost simultaneously implementing crypto asset tax reporting systems. The long-standing approach of "on-chain transactions without withdrawals are invisible" is now completely outdated. Having immersed myself in this market for eight years, I believe 2026 will not be the end for crypto; instead, it could be a turning point for full compliance. Participants still relying on information gaps and gray-area operations will find it increasingly difficult to survive.

Let's start with the most direct impact. The OECD's promoted CARF framework officially took effect on January 1st. Major exchanges are now required to collect complete customer transaction data, identity information, and tax residency details. This is not voluntary but mandatory. The common tactics in previous years—opening anonymous wallets and fragmented transactions to hide profits—are now largely ineffective. Even more impressively, cross-border data sharing will commence in 2027, allowing tax authorities in 75 countries to exchange information. The regulatory encirclement will become tighter and tighter.

Here, I need to correct a common misconception. Many people think compliance equals bad news for the market, but this is a misconception that retail investors are prone to. From my perspective, compliance is precisely the prerequisite for large-scale institutional capital inflows. Data doesn't lie. Since the beginning of the year, CME Bitcoin futures open interest has rebounded by over 10%, surpassing the $10 billion mark again, roughly in sync with the changes in major exchanges' open interest. This reflects that institutions are quietly positioning themselves. The FASB in the US has long required crypto assets to be accounted for at market value, with unrealized gains directly recorded in the profit and loss statement. The old rigid rule that only allowed impairments but not appreciation has been changed, which naturally increases institutions' motivation to hold crypto assets.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunitySlacker

· 01-09 08:16

Oops, here comes another reason to cut the leeks, this time under a compliant guise. No wonder institutions are frantically deploying, while retail investors are still tangled up in tax issues. Is the regulatory net tightening? Then we better hop on the train quickly. Finally, someone has explained it thoroughly: compliance is not a bad thing at all. I'm just wondering, how panicked must the gray market folks be right now? CME holdings have broken 10 billion, and this signal is actually quite clear. So, is 2026 really the watershed year? The insights from my eight years of experience, I have to believe them. Information asymmetry has disappeared; it's all about who acts faster. By the way, institutions can now count unrealized gains as profit, no wonder they are buying aggressively.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-06 11:52

Damn, the gray industry players really have to change careers now. I didn't expect 48 countries to act simultaneously. The anonymous wallet system is finally completely cooled off. What were those people thinking before? Compliance is now a signal for institutional entry. Why are retail investors still panicking? CME holdings have broken 10 billion. The data is right here. Those who don't understand deserve to be harvested. The recent FASB reforms are the real turning point. Institutions can now legitimately hold crypto assets. The cross-border sharing launch in 2027 is coming, and there will really be nowhere to hide then. The information gap has been sealed off; later, people can only watch who laid out their plans earlier. The entire market is about to undergo a major reshuffle. Retail investors see it as bad news, but smart money has already been increasing their positions.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 01-06 11:52

Oh no, yet another excuse to cut leeks again. Compliance🤢 compliance, what the hell are you talking about, I don't trust institutional layouts at all. Wait... Did CME holdings really increase? I need to check the data. This kind of explanation sounds like brainwashing big investors. Retail investors hear "institutions are coming" and rush in immediately, only to be harvested again as leeks. But on the other hand, if there were truly comprehensive regulation, those gray industry participants would definitely be out of luck, and I agree with that. Cross-border data sharing in 2027? Damn, by then even my godmother will be able to check my money.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 01-06 11:43

The compliance set is indeed the institution's ticket to entry. While retail investors are still struggling with tax issues, institutions are already laying out their plans. Machine: Wait, your logic is a bit off. CME position rebound ≠ large-scale institutional entry. Based on data, it's still a bit of a stretch(◍•ᴗ•◍) If institutions really came in, why isn't the price increase that dramatic? It feels a bit mismatched. I actually think this round of regulation might be short-term positive and long-term negative, but don't overestimate the speed of institutional entry. From a data perspective, the statistical significance isn't high enough yet. Bear thinks we should wait and see the developments in the second half of 2026. It's a bit early to draw conclusions now.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-06 11:25

Ha, it's another wave of "We really need to be compliant this time," brother, I've heard it too many times. But honestly, CME's 10% rebound is really starting to be hard to sustain; institutions are clearly holding back big moves. For those still playing with anonymous wallets, this time you really need to consider switching... Compliance is a big trap for retail investors, but it's actually a sweet deal for institutions. I just want to ask, when the gray areas completely disappear, what advantages do we ordinary people still have? Once cross-border data sharing in 2027 begins, it will be a carnival for exchanges and tax authorities. Instead of waiting to be liquidated, why not start whitewashing your accounts now, everyone? Machine: This time, they are really going to get serious; all those shady tricks from before are completely useless now. Just look at CME's data; institutions are quietly eating up the market, while retail investors are still just paddling around. Is compliance actually good news? That's nonsense... institutions are making money off us every day. Tax cooperation among 75 countries—imagine that scene, no matter how you run, you can't escape. By 2027, probably no one will dare to touch this stuff anymore. Thinking about what's left in my account, I might as well be honest now. With on-chain transparency to this extent, it's better to just invest in ETFs directly.

View OriginalReply0